I'd say if you're interested in performance to this level, it is useful to know both at&t inline asm syntax on top of the simpler microsoft inline asm syntax.
Static analysis will not stop most of the exploits that have happened on iOS/OSX in the recent years.
Often it is a situation where multiple processes are working together and there is a way to trick a privileged process into modifying memory in a way it shouldn't.
Two games by the same studio who are praised for their ability to tell a story.
To be honest there are only a few games I played during the ps3 era (bought it for the cell chip+linux and left it unpatched when they removed it from the firmware until the system was broken wide open), but the last of us was a great story and fun game.
One thing their example doesn't handle is browser location history on clicking elements in their UI.
Maybe it was due to how simple the example was, but having to click back many times based on how many times a user used the interface is just bad design.
The alarm app on iOS can run into an issue where it will not play sound regardless of any other setting. It has existed in many versions of iOS. It has happened in iOS 10 and iOS 11, I don't know about the previous versions.
They fix is to reboot the phone.
I cannot trust it for critical alarms, so a simple device by the bed is required again.
I haven't had to recover from an OEM vendor install in awhile, but if I remember right there are many situations where the user does not need to input the serial number for activation.
If you are interested in this, people tried the long/short strategy in currencies (forex) and called it a grid trade.
The system would be both long and short the same contract and take profit at a given interval on both sides. When they took a profit, they would reopen a trade on the same side.
Ultimately it was just a mean reversion strategy where one would not close out their losses. So the profit was linear while the losses often became geometric until the time the market came back to where they started the grid.
If you just want to buy both sides and never close either trade, there is no profit just a loss of spread/commission on both legs.
Most of the people who did it looked at their account balance rather than NAV, so they were mostly just abusing leverage until a margin call.
Edit: To be fair, some grids were smarter in their allocation and weighted to be positive to the carry, so at least they would collect interest everyday when the contracts swapped.
The view count itself isn't why they are buying views, it is the ranking in search and related videos.
I find youtube/twitch have the same problems as the CPM industry. If you punish the provider of content for negative viewer action you provide a means for competition to cheaply force the content creator out of the market.
This is why twitch doesn't punish view botting, as any viewer could spend $5 to shut down a $50k/day stream.
If youtube really does use a guilty until proven innocent method then they are just punishing honest content creators that don't understand the dynamics of online media.
The blockchain itself would be too expensive to store a large amount of data, so they would only be storing magnet links much like most tracker sites currently do.
No way to convey intonation in text so people often use a question mark to convey it.