You just have no idea how logic works, If you dissent against people who think they are dissenting against a idea, then what you are actually doing is agreeing to whatever those people were desenting against in the first place.
Its double negation law in action.
So you cannot really dissent against a dissentor without very clearly sitting in the middle and stating so.
Very true, culture is a type of information system and it depends on distribution,
so at some point the cause of alot of problems lies at corporate media production creating a positive feedback loop of shitty culture (low quality information).
The longterm solution is clear, its a waste of effort to try and put the tubepaste back into the tube.
I think the mindset is valid but the people behind it are inconsistent, if your locale is being around indignous african people. Then killing and enslaving them kinda goes against the whole "act local" thing.
Thereby making them immoral by their own standards.
You cannot export your sense of locality to somewhere else, i dont think thats how it works.
RPN style thinking is also something i feel that helped.
Because "thinking" has the inputs on tape/memory already, so its matter of bandwidth and pre-processing.
The language of computation is now a common tongue and of course there will be people who master it poorly or who you perhaps would call inferior.
I think this speaks more for the "inferiors" (programmers) not against it. You can make syntax in math represent anything but practically mean nothing, having programmers in fields where they could make big mistakes, points to its power.
Quite recently, mathematical knowledge was reserved for the "elite" in part because of the dense amount of esoteric grammar that exist in math, and i would say still is. Alot of things can be expressed in multiple ways like geometry, algebra. The "real" math you speak of is instilled convention.
Sometimes the most efficient way is not always the best way and correctness only exists in the framework itself.
If you are going to compare math and programming then you first have to acknowledge that math is also just a language, to express certain concepts in which itself is quite littered with dead and inefficient code.
The fact that the grammatical and syntax constraints of higher math are mostly applied ad-hoc in proofs,rings,fields
means you can keep refining some fraction of it ad infinitum thereby giving the illusion of correctness but in its essence is a rich mans PHP.
You might have looked at the code but i dont think you know what you are looking at. comparing it to a database is just silly.
There is no "state", the state gets created and verified by transactions. What this means is that integrity of the system does not depend on a central unit, it hinges on the environment.
Between the orientdb/neo4j dick swinging contest and the whole oreilly "graph database" book for pure fluff. I am left with a very bad taste in my mouth.
It tries to do the whole vendor lock-in thing... badly.
Its double negation law in action. So you cannot really dissent against a dissentor without very clearly sitting in the middle and stating so.