I agree. Just because JS has its way of doing it does not mean you need to stick to that. I mean, TS adds a bunch of new keywords to the language that JS lacks. Why not simply stick to those intuitive keywords rather than this weird variable naming nonsense that JS has to use because it doesn't have access modifiers of any kind?
I can assure you that doing it in TS would not have been any slower and you would have gained all the benefits that static type checking brings with it.
VueJS 3 in particular is much better suited to use TS than its predecessor (without any additional plugins).
This is so ass-backwards and you're practically twisting yourself over backwards a dozen times to somehow try to argue that this wasn't malicious. He basically poisoned the library, and you're blaming all the people who got poisoned because "they didn't fully inspect the contents of the code".
But you didn't have to go to that restaurant! Don't you do a full health and safety inspection of every restaurant you visit (and of their entire supply chain)?
That last argument sure sounds like an argument from feels rather than facts and logic, I thought the right hated that kind of rhetoric.
The obvious answer is of course that health care is a public service and should not be reliant on charitable organizations, which would be absolutely ridiculous. (Yes reproductive care is health care, arguments made from personal feelings or believes are not a worthy retort against medical scientific consensus)
Please point me to the parts of this method that are good or effective.