HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

maatrson

no profile record

comments

maatrson
·4년 전·discuss
Razorpay is innocent here. What kind of language is Hindutva Goons? Indian law is applicable at Indian soil as American law is applicable soil. American financial law are very similar for 3rd party companies. You have clear intent to hurt Razorpay brand value.

Let’s say if a CEO support country top leader and there is nothing wrong in it. He is Indian citizen and it’s his choice to do so.

I have donated several foundations in India from US via razorpay gateway and it works for few VISA cards.

You can’t dispute with police under this section given section 91 is a rare section. Your intent to harass, malign YC brand name and its companies. Please do read about section 91 and it’s implications.

Please check your claim and facts. Be a positive member to YC community. Any topic associated politics and hate should not be discussed here.

Let’s make better world talking about latest technology trends.

I think YC in future to flag post like this if they see motivation towards politics and false information.

Just updating the title doesn’t help much. The post owner pretended and presented a false and half narrative. He used only links that would be beneficial to his claim or final purpose.
maatrson
·4년 전·discuss
Exactly! They received a legal order and company has press release which completely justify action taken.
maatrson
·4년 전·discuss
Agree
maatrson
·4년 전·discuss
Razorpay received a section 91 request and they compliant as per law.

Most importantly, section 91 can be issued by police office such as DSP or SHO.

This post simple some sort of revenge against razorpay.

OP on purpose didn’t mention of section 91 and giving misleading information to YC.

OP also making this about politics. This is very old law and used in a lot cases in the past.