HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

mikewarot

12,608 karmajoined 7년 전
I'm currently deep into the territory of the crank or lone genius... more than likely I'm just a crank... but hey, I'm retired, and eccentric old man vibes suit me just fine. (I also look the part)

Here's what ChatGPT says about me:

Mike Warot: The Tinkerer of Tomorrow

A hardware hacker with a poet’s soul, Mike blends old-school radio wisdom with cutting-edge curiosity. Whether he's repairing atomic clocks, reinventing FPGA logic with BitGrid, or pondering the electromagnetic vector potential, he’s always deep in the guts of how things really work. Part philosopher, part engineer, Mike asks the questions others overlook — and then builds the answers from scratch. He’s open source in spirit, Pascal in practice, and eternally tuned to the weird frequencies where innovation lives.

meet.hn/city/us-Chicago

Socials: - bsky.app/profile/mikewarot.bsky.social - github.com/mikewarot - x.com/mikewarot

Interests: Hardware, Open Source, Programming, Research, Science, Technology, Writing, Travel

---

No person should ever have to blindly trust a computer program to do the right thing.

Blog: mikewarot.blogspot.com

I've been programming since 1979. I have made spur, helical, and bevel gears in a job shop setting. I have assembled computers from scratch, selecting clock generators, CPUs, logic gates etc.

I can fix ANYTHING given sufficient time and budget. I've repaired cesium beam atomic clocks, magnetic amplifiers, and an assortment of undocumented industrial control systems.

I've written programs that track equipment inspection, monitor the calibration of large water meters, and control the gluing of cardboard boxes, to name the interesting highlights... I did all of that before 2000.

I was a system administrator for 15 years, as time went on, less and less broke, and they eventually didn't need me.

I made gears for 5 years, bevel, spur, helical, splines, etc. Now I'd like to get back into programming. I did the Advent of Code in 2020, in Pascal... you can see the carnage on my github account: https://github.com/mikewarot/Advent_of_Code_in_Pascal

Currently working on getting BitGrid, a vision of bringing Petflops to the masses, brought into the real world using LLMs to help get past analysis paralysis.

email: chezmike at gmail

Submissions

Ask HN: Is AI Alignment about to be solved, for profit?

1 points·by mikewarot·5개월 전·1 comments

Ask HN: Is Google search broken now?

3 points·by mikewarot·10개월 전·4 comments

comments

mikewarot
·3시간 전·discuss
Sandalwood - it's nice and luxurious, just like paying full freight on tokens
mikewarot
·5시간 전·discuss
It'll be interesting to see the eventual application of this to moon bounce. If they put it on a sufficiently stiff backplane, and calibrate things carefully, the 240 channel system they hint at looks like it might be able to pull it off.

Personally, I'd like to have a coherent SDR transceiver for HF/VHF that I can expand arbitrarily, and doesn't cost multiple thousands of dollars.
mikewarot
·5시간 전·discuss
Be sure to check your states registry. Like many professionals, Engineering requires extensive study, testing, on the job training, and eventually, licensure. The Computer Engineering test in Indiana had a 56% initial pass rate last year.

Also, AI can't assume liability, that's the responsibility of humans.
mikewarot
·어제·discuss
I've learned that I'm just not cynical enough. Here's the relevant Peter Girnus post[1], he tells the underlying truth through satire.

  10 years. We report our compliance every 60 days, then once a year, which is to say we have turned handing you your own machine into a paperwork schedule that runs through 2036. Any new repair tool we build, we only have to share once more than 50% of our dealers already have it. We decide when a dealer has it. We build the clock and we wind the clock.
https://x.com/gothburz/status/2075211022198096180
mikewarot
·어제·discuss
The only authors who would sign such a deal would be near the end of their lives, and wishing to provide for their heirs. I don't think that it would be a widely accepted practice.
mikewarot
·어제·discuss
During WW2 in the United States, you had all sorts of consumer goods companies reorganized to output a prodigious amount of military supplies. There were multiple companies making the same model of things, with fairly rigorous QA to ensure quality and uniformity.

For example, the BC-348 receiver, widely used in aircraft, was produced initially by RCA, and eventually "farmed out" to 3 other manufacturers.

More than 4 million M1903 Springfield Rifle were produced by the Smith-Corona typewriter company.

Here's a really good example, look at how the production of proximity fuzes, was distributed.[1]

The key thing is to have second sources for everything. Something the US military seems to have forgotten, or decided to ignore in their pursuit of gold-plated weapons systems that give the most kick-backs.

[1] https://usautoindustryworldwartwo.com/vtproximityfuze.htm
mikewarot
·어제·discuss
How is it that I created $6.02 Trillion of shareholder value, but only got $15.11 million of it?

Oh no... I just sympathized with Elon and the Epstein class.

Let's walk that back... $15.11m for 14 years work, over a million per year, because I got lucky in the end. It's all a casino, and your labor/life is the table stakes.

That $6.02 Trillion?, that's an illusion, because if anyone decided to sell big, half would vanish immediately, more likely 80% or more.

What an impressive, and depressing game.
mikewarot
·그저께·discuss
Trying out AI is a fun and sometimes useful thing to do.

But you should never trust it completely. A lot of people have already died because they trusted it with their lives. "Full self driving" isn't.
mikewarot
·그저께·discuss
I've got 459,203 words posted here on HN alone, according to clickhouse

I'm currently ranked #495

https://serjaimelannister.github.io/hn-words/

I'm out of the labor pool with nothing but time until I age out. I also have strong minority opinions.
mikewarot
·그저께·discuss
Relevant Peter Girnus post, satire, sort of

https://x.com/gothburz/status/2074902503599059357

I just know insurance companies are going to use this to try to weasel out of doing their job
mikewarot
·그저께·discuss
I feel like crimes over a certain threshold should include accessories in the punishment, like the Death Penalty here in Indiana does.

It certainly helps motivate them to testify in court.

Strong minority opinion: If someone steals more than the average total lifetime earnings of 10 people, I think the death penalty should apply. That's about 25 million USD
mikewarot
·4일 전·discuss
Free Pascal, Assembly, STOIC, Metamine, Python 2
mikewarot
·5일 전·discuss
Whenever the nostalgia kicks in hard, I fire up OpenVMS 7.2 on the virtual 11/780 in my cheap Motorola phone, then SSH in.

I love OpenSimH and Termux.
mikewarot
·5일 전·discuss
>Personal wikis always died for the same reason.

Mine (WikidPad) died when I switched to Linux, and learned that breaking changes to WxPython rendered it worthless, as none of the dialog boxes functioned after that point. Sure, the source from 2012 was available, but my Wiki really wasn't.

Eventually this forced me back to Windows... but it was too late, now I'm back on Windows, and still don't trust WikidPad.

>Keeping them current was tedious, and humans hate tedium. But the tedium is the one thing language models are immune to. They will happily re-link, re-summarize, and reconcile contradictions across a hundred files without complaining.

Yeah, and you're going to trust the LLM to reliably maintain this? Not a wise choice.

I really wish we had a reliable way to annotate and interlink documents using hypertext. Unfortunately, HTML doesn't actually let you mark up (annotate) hypertext.

We still, 81 years later, don't have a Memex! 8(
mikewarot
·7일 전·discuss
I need nuclear for cheap power, I almost never actually rush to make rockets, I just want to avoid the grind for technology research. ;-)
mikewarot
·8일 전·discuss
Well, this is certainly an interesting point at which we all find ourselves. I'm personally going to have to learn what a KV cache is, how big they are, and the costs associated with storing this value, instead of merely caching it. The cost of the loop ends up quadratic because of reprocessing everything each time a new query was added. In theory, this means that after a year, there could be a billion input tokens, just if you say "thanks!" to the model at the end of a conversation, which is nuts. Explicitly storing the model state should make it a linear cost again.

I've been following Ed Zitron's reporting on AI and costs/profits. When Mike Pound starts talking about the costs at 4:12, he hints at the fact that none of us know the actual cost of handling a token. Ed's reporting hints that it may be quite a bit higher than we've been lead to suspect, it may, in fact, be far above current retail prices, subsidized as part of the "marketing" expenses on the AI companies balance sheet to try to gain market share.

It seems we're in for a "call to Jesus" moment, and a big pop in the markets as a result. This video is part of the structure that does the popping.

I think that actually storing the model state after each query/result will become the standard, to save reprocessing tokens. Switching between models would thus become discouraged because it would lose that state. It wouldn't be impossible, it just wouldn't be cheap. I could see storing the entire AI state, including "thinking", model version, etc. along with the code in the GitHub repository, right next to the commit comment. Gits delta compressor should make storing all that binary data tractable.

We're living in interesting times. Agentic coding certainly seems valuable, but it may turn out to be ruinously expensive, compared to just using us human programmers. We'll have to wait and see.
mikewarot
·8일 전·discuss
I think it's a horrible idea. It's also impractical.

What company is going to willingly face the inevitable wrongful death and injury lawsuits that result?
mikewarot
·10일 전·discuss
>Reduced centrifuge stack size to 10.

Well, that'll make Rocket Rush a bit more fun to play. It was taking forever to get up to 40 U235s.

[Edit] Nope.... it doesn't change the requirements from 40 U235, just makes it so a centrifuge will fit on a rocket. 8(

Am I the only one who likes rocket rush?
mikewarot
·10일 전·discuss
I think the ASIC we discussed yesterday[1] from Phantafield is a hint of what is to come. Instead of constantly moving weights from HBM to MACs, they have local dynamic ram areas that hold the weights locally, using a novel architecture that is more efficient at using space than the traditional SRAM cell, especially in a mostly-read environment.

Instead of doing MAC using 16 bit wide hardware, they do it all bit serial, so that they can fit far more computing into the same chip area, trading a bit of the speed they get from all that local RAM into efficiencies in usage. It also makes it easy to do FP8 support, or any other bit size required.

I expect another few orders of magnitude improvement in the cost of compute over the next decade. Moore's law isn't dead yet.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48713686
mikewarot
·10일 전·discuss
>The knowledge is not in danger, in fact, it has never been safer. The AI models have read every manual that no human reads. They will recite, flawlessly and forever, exactly how all machines work. If this were only about competence, it would be the most secure moment in the history of computing.

Obviously this person doesn't have enough experience with the current crop of AIs. This is the exact reason why we should be concerned in the first place. Someone has to design and build the next version of everything, and AI isn't qualified to do the job, and might never be.

>What is dying is acquaintance. The plain, unglamorous intimacy of having fought a particular machine, and lost, and gone back, and finally felt the thing give.

This is true. But then again, who among us had to get up in the middle of the night, and trudge out to an outhouse? Who had to shovel a bit more coal into the furnace? Who had to pump water, and heat it on the stove? Who had to split wood, and stack it for the winter?

There are many, many things we're no longer acquainted with, and that's sad, but still ok. What's not ok is losing the competence required to maintaining the infrastructure and supply chain supporting society and civilization.