But can help and be accelerated by such. As this has been the tune for a long time as things have been presented as being solved. A wild west is how you open back up marketplaces to solve these issues. Especially as those issues are fundamental towards handling a rapid rise of productivity/entropy. This is the challenge of now. And intelligence as a mechanism is an actionable route, versus waiting for people to change perspective. Especially as the question can be whether the current now is capable of even handling an increased amount of Entropy. In addition that rise of Productivity is Unavoidable.
You would be amazed at the amount of unsolved problems that Intelligence as a mechanism helps solve. Goals would still be abound as that is the Consequence of maintaining a highly entropic system. It would be more interesting bluntly.
By odds and in the context of RLHF the human could very well thumbs up the output without recognition of said hallucination.
As hallucination is a general term giving to said phenomenon. Otherwise the question Emerges why 2023? And why was that not known colloquially before hand. When the basis of these Algorithms come the the 80s?
Reading through there is a heavy fault in logic. Statically reasonable limitations to llm output based on training material, ignores hallucinations. And hallucinations ignore the sheer chance of new emergent information by odds.
Autism isn't a disorder, but a mutation and in this instance can be correlated to the microbiome of the gut. But does not account for the increase in reeln nor changes in rna that cause increased sensitivity to stimuli. And is only treated as a disorder in respect to assembly line predetermined processes typical of today's organizations. That runs counter to the increased stimuli of maintaining said predetermined process, while punishing divergence.
This is also noting that data can be fit to suit a narrative and causation is different than correlation. But seem similar in the general context of today's discourse. And limited by predictability while noting the massive reproduction crisis in science such as this article and others. Including the recent controversy at Stanford with the president stepping down due to enabling the manipulation of data specifically in this domain of science.
The EU has a bill on the table that would make open source authors liable for patching bugs and exploits in commercial software.
If that bill goes through. This argument is nullified at the global scale. And it behooves open source authors to create licensing agreements Commercially.
Open Source simply means Open Source. Everything after the fact is up to the license and bad actors will always ignore such.
Threads like these make me realize how little foresight there is into the genuine creation of Frankenstein's Monster Situation.
Because you never learn the Monsters Name, nor was the Monster a Monster. Just Poof Here he is and there is a Mob with Torches. Rather than being seen in wonder and possibilities.
Not to mention at what Scale can we see one of these models in this Light? As Life enough for a Mob and Torches. Or how soon that will be. And who wants to be Frankenstein? As they remember his Name as the Monster's.
Logic is simple inline with reducing power draw from a simplistic instruction set.
Move into a space where we have rapid manufacturing for Specialized chips. Alongside the concept inherit to Nvidia's DPU and you have something very Interesting.
It's difficult as most of the risk can be reinterpreted as a highly advanced user.
But that is where some form of hard personhood zero proof mechanism NEEDS to come in. This can then be used in conjunction with a Ledger used to track deployment of high spec models. And create an easy means to Audit and deploy new advanced tests to ensure safety.
Really what everyone also need to keep in mind at the larger scale is that final turing test with no room for deniability. And remember all those Sci-fi movies and how that Moment is portrayed traditionally.