"... when examining only those who passed the exam (i.e. licensed or license-pending attorneys), GPT-4’s performance is estimated to drop to ∼48th percentile overall, and ∼15th percentile on essays ..."
so this means that ChatGPT is right in the middle of the performance of licensed or license-pending attorneys.
and for essays its still better than 15 percent of the humans.
you are either compliant or you are not. This gives rise to “bounded sets” of rule-followers and rule-enforcers rather than “centred sets” of people with shared values.2
Instead, I started thinking about properties:
qualities or characteristics of code rather than rules to follow.
Properties define a goal or centre to move towards. Your code is only closer to or further from the centre, and there is always a clear direction of travel.
.....
and then he gives a list of five properties that good architectures can aim for.
..." The series in which this is published does not peer-review,
and contains all of the last authors' work...
... that major papers are omitted in this "meta-analysis" "
So no peer-review,
written in a journal that has close ties to one of the authors
and omitted major papers that should have been included.
Missing from the list is Zettlr
https://zettlr.com/
which is opensource, looks very nice and is built for the Zettelkasten method and has LaTeX integration.
It fails spectacularly - the code wont even compile and there are many things missing to get a working solution.