Yes, I think I get it. For example if your creating an AGPLv3 server application, the client I guess must be AGPLv3 too. I just don't understand the point of SSPL even though it looks completely FOSS license to me (maybe just OSI has its own agenda to freely let big cloud companies just use popular FOSS projects without annoying restrictions that would hurt them financially).
This is the only kind of downtime that makes your competitor way more furious than you are. I hope Elon Musk's tweet was the beginning of the end for Faceook, Inc.
I read the article and I understood that the authors are stuck in the 1990s and just discovered the staggering fact that their data fit distributed kv stores not traditional sql .
I thought Grafana was doing great with its managed offerings. Personally I'd prefer you consider BSL before SSPL since it's usually clearer to most people.
It's amazing that people are downvoting simple technical facts to appeal to others without even providing a single technical argument. It's as if I stated a political statement or something.
There is nothing unconventional in moving from SQL to key-value distributed database. And if it was any other company that submitted this very same post here we wouldn't be talking here right now as it would have never gotten a single upvote. The posts of this company almost always come with their upvotes right after submission (by others) and the founders were surprisingly replying minutes after submission. This is systematic behavior.
You seem to be confused between zerotrust and encryption. Zerotrust is about auhtentication/authorization at the application level. Also tailscale is as centralized as Cloudflare et al. What happens when tailscale servers go down? Can 2 peers behind NAT still be able to connect to each other? can they synchronize each other's public endpoint and public key?
zerotrust has nothing to do with p2p, zero-trust is about making sure that this user is authorized to access that application at the resource level not using some decades old segmentation/network level policies. Zerotier also claims to be zerotrust but it's technically not. Cloudflare, Citrix, PulseSecure have zerotrust offerings, but many others sadly just claim to be either by ignorance or dishonesty.
Of course I know of Brad Fitzpatrick. I am just questioning the product and its "innovation" compared to the rest of the industry in order to be promoted here that much and I think I know enough about the industry to see that there is nothing to see here for all that hype assuming it's genuine. I can get that for FOSS projects, but not for companies.
I understand. But given the product features compared to the rest of the industry, Tailscale brings no real value compared to Zero-tier hen it comes to meshes, it's not zerotrust like Cloudflare, Twingate, and many others, it claims to be open source while only the client is and it cannot be used without their closed source control plane where most of the feature are behind paywall, it's way more expensive than reputable offerings like Citrix, Cloudflare and others. Their security is very dubious to me (they can in fact inject their own public keys to connect to clients machines and there is no way but to trust their word that they won't). I mean, what's the innovation compared to the industry in order to get that systemically excessive coverage here?
Unfortunately this company is known for its shady agressive marketing on hacker news. The upvotes count is really suspicious and this is not the first time.
EDIT: Why is the downvoting? the post was given like 9 upvotes in the first 5 minutes. I frequently go to "new" and this is a highly suspicious behaviur.
It's theoretically the same idea at the node level instead of the application level except that the WireGuard curve25519 keys now cannot be verified since they are published by a 3rd party that you have zero control on. This 3rd party can simply connect to your machines anytime by injecting its public keys into your nodes and have complete access into your private network. That's the power of owing your own CA as opposed to letting others injecting peer public keys as if there is nothing to verify.