Hope this isnt too spicy a take, but i find it a bit disingenuous to use language that implies invention (and with no mention or citation of previous work), only to switch to dismissive language when someone notes a predecessor who you've apparently already heard of
Fair question! I've no idea, but good on you for pondering
If it were me I'd rip the band-aid off, but might just be me being grey-beard. Name
Collisions are inevitable these days I guess, and equally one
could argue that no project should be able to camp out on a dictionary term :)
Either way, best of luck with your project (which looks super interesting) - I neglected to say that bit :facepalm:
Sorry to be that chap, but UX is not a synonym for UI
I'm not a UX person, but have seen an increasing trend of the two terms being used interchangeably - it's actually a really interesting and nuanced field (more rooted in psychology, information architecture, and human centred design).
It's sorta like how a lotta folk assume SRE is just a neologism for "devops" and in the process miss out on the really interesting differences
Off topic, but whilst we've clearly got to accept name collisions in such a large word - it'd be ideal if there was _a modicum_ of care around not using names on other actively maintained projects
"Sculpting" as used here just feels like a pretentious euphemism for "vibing" as opposed to what actual sculpting is like (hint: it would be akin to... dramatic pause... writing code)
Brb, just rolled my eyes so hard that I'm now staring at my own visual cortex
All the GitHub links on your extension page are borked (including issues)
From the look of the associated domain it looks like you're going full product, best of luck
I'm a huge proponent of graph & visual analysis of complex systems - would have loved to try this out, but will always skip closed source editor extensions (especially in the age of widespread npm supply chain attacks & vibe coding)
Is it any more effective than (say) messing with its recognition so that any attempt to deepfake just ends up as garbled nonsense?
Can't help wondering if the censor models get tweaked more frequently and aggressively (also presumedly easier to low-pass on a detector than a generator, since lossiness doesn't impact final image)
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jul/05/myste...