> Corporations don't exist as an entity except via the authorisation from government.
Eliminate corporations from being legal entities. They shield employees from their illegal actions and provide a shield against lawsuits. Then we could avoid the extra litigation necessary for Peircing the corporate veil.
Capitalism is not hypothetical and we have evidence of it. The wall falling in 1980's Germany and seeing the stark difference in quality of life being one of the more dramatic examples.
"Prove that our schools are actually carrying out indoctrination."
We can postulate how a top down approach might work but these students will still be suffering while we sort and continually monitor (we won't) the system.
Involving market forces and allowing parents to have say in where their children will be educated puts the power in the most effective hands for change.
Good points. We just don't have that vacuum to test as gov's differ.
Market forces improve conditions. Motivations are realigned to the incentive of the parent's satisfaction with their kid's education. Service improves when you have competition.
Perhaps an increased voucher for special needs students is in order.
Society is disadvantaged when intelligent students aren't allowed to achieve their fullest potential. We need programs that allow students to independently work at their own pace. We'd have a ton more 15-16 year old's attending college.
You have a lot of questions. Denmark has money tied to the child and not the school district. Look into their system for more answers.
Everything is a process of improvement overtime. The reality is, we don't have all the answers ever. What matter's is how much things are improving overtime. I don't see that with public schools.
I could easily ask you a ton of questions on how to fix Detroit or LA schools.
"Of course the Prussian cabal has been secretly controlling our schools for as long as Prussia has been a country, but effectively?"
Prussia set the model. Our country uses it for our country's indoctrination. Not a hard concept.
"And I don't see voucher schools in my state offering radically different education, but rather, just doing the same thing with better discipline and fewer special needs kids."
Why?
"Most children in Denmark attend public schools."
But the funds are tied to the children, not the school district. Doing so would create more competition in existing public schools.
"Working people had to pay these other people and for what?"
The productive capacity this money enabled. Except instead of the gov doing it 1000 miles away, they had skin in the game, took risks and monitored the situation to ensure success.