the article talks about how they compared cells in a very nano-plastic concentrated formula and a diluted one, and the concentrated one caused way more cell deaths
plus, it isn't just about cancer, microplastics are known to disrupt your hormones, so the danger is pretty clear
why not just take it seriously instead of calling it "plastic alarmism"? we're polluting the entire world with these particles
why does emissions get way more attention than plastics and forever chemicals? that shit scares me way more. At this pace, soon our food and water will not be safe anymore, what's the point of preventing climate change if you won't have water to drink and food to eat?
i feel this so much. i didn't know shit about sleep back then, but in retrospective i had such poor sleeping habits and was barely getting 7 hours of sleep at much on most nights for such a long time, it feels terrible to know this now haha.
i'm reading these are used everywhere, pretty much like plastics :(
i really think this problem is out of our hands, i wonder how much time we have until the food and water has so much plastic and forever chemicals that it isn't safe to eat anymore
I've always had a dislike for discussing PRs through Slack because the conversation tends to get lost after the merge. When you revisit the discussion a year later, there is no context available to explain why things were done in a particular way. However, this product effectively addresses this problem. You keep the best of both worlds: fast replies in slack and the conversation stays in Github for later reference.
what's going to happen with the comma bodies? when i saw the yt video of him explaining how the next challenge is to solve AGI and for that you need on device learning it really made sense to me. Is he stepping out of that path completely?