There is a major contradiction depending on the definition of “support staff” and the role of the llm in the system which may need access to sensitive data or systems to perform its functions.
Pretty much every item besides the Open Closed Principle which deals with deals with future changes touch on being able to snap pieces that know as little as possible about each other together to create the final product while being robust to change in the underlying pieces.
This comes out in the practical world in being able to make Java libraries that don't need to be recompiled or redistributed because of changes to other parts.
This sort of object oriented programming was doomed to fail because it requires thoughtful world building and not a direct assault on the ticket you were assigned.
It you look at most of SOLID it is about building little pieces that eventually will fit together and rules to avoid incompatibilities when the world you built comes together.
Shouldn't the punishment for obstruction, in many cases, be higher than the base offense to prevent that as a default strategy to beat the base offense? Granted, not that much higher, but there is some logic to it being a greater offense.
We do have semiprivate places in public, for example bathrooms, based on an expectation of privacy. There is no reason that expectation cannot be changed or extended in ways.
It makes sense if ruining lives is good for the company, firing and layoffs that are /necessary/ are hard for anyone with empathy. They should be rewarded for doing that.
That’s very appealing, the problem is the prompts control the results to such a degree, the person composing the prompts are the executives and at that point, you have not done anything.
> The most valuable company in the world hasnt shown a dime in profit.
NVidia is quite profitable (it may not be enough to justify its current market cap), so is Aramco. Which is the most valuable in the world is up to you.
This is a bit of a trick question.
The law is explicitly written to make this illegal. If it was not explicit, it most likely would be legal by time shifting precedent.