If you are eating the baked shit and enjoying it, and a subset of shit-eaters might also like your baked shit recipe, then yes - it would be wrong to say "nobody will eat that shit".
I suspect HN readers won't see enough value in your baked shit recipe for it to reach the front page - sorry. But bake away!
The post was created to show how AI helped this person solve their particular problem - which it appeared to do successfully.
Other people commenting about AI hype on the post isn't an indication that the post itself was created to hype AI, or that that the post itself is "bad".
Interesting idea, however I think more focus needs to be put on ensuring that the photos still represent reality (as much an AI edited photo can). E.g. in the first example under Stage Empty Rooms, the type of window changes between the original and edited photo. I think focusing on more subtle edits to improve the consistency and appearance of photos, maybe with the odd object removal, would be a safer bet.
I experienced this just now. The download slowed down to approx 500kB/s for the last 1% or so. When this happens, you can Ctrl+C to cancel and then start the download again It will continue from where it left off, but at regular (fast) download speed.
I suspect HN readers won't see enough value in your baked shit recipe for it to reach the front page - sorry. But bake away!