You know for any other observer it would not be unreasonable language that you’re just being a casual critic of the quote you pasted.
“Deeply un-empathic” could be seen as a casual ad hominem about the speakers state of mind.
I don’t care or think you’re being that; I get your point without thinking you’re casually critical.
I just don’t think your point is any more interesting or nuanced. It’s very same-y. As if you translated what you read rather than expressed a novel emotional context.
If “has killed people” was a viable argument for regulation we’d have a lot more regulation.
Which is fine; engineers are not divine beings. They can have their figurative value deflated like everyone else is these days. Engineered devices have killed a lot of people.
“Deeply un-empathic” could be seen as a casual ad hominem about the speakers state of mind.
I don’t care or think you’re being that; I get your point without thinking you’re casually critical.
I just don’t think your point is any more interesting or nuanced. It’s very same-y. As if you translated what you read rather than expressed a novel emotional context.