If you can't get any job then you're done. Even if there're jobs but employers want the prices to fall for a specific occupation, then you're don too. This is not specific to South Korea though.
I believe that this situations could get better if HR companies weren't thriving everywhere just cutting down any opportunities for the people with stupid assessments, even universities graduates, and letting the experienced and trained personnel that belong to a business make their calls, but this depends on the business willingness.
This is not funny, many of us live in countries where we need that money. We're underpaid but we try. I'm glad that we have high quality researchers in this platforms but punishing us goes too far.
No Amazon. If you can, contact the seller directly and agree with them the terms for buying and delivering. In most occasions they already have some standard for this.
I don't even have the coding level that the writer has, but I felt myself so expelled from the industry that I quit looking for jobs. I just gave up and started working independently. Financially now I'm really broke but I think I'm better with myself. Maybe I'm not the "super-programmer-hacker" but at least I don't have to participate feeding the sadistic pleasure and sense of power that recruiters have on us.
What about the trade offs between privacy and the possibility of being part of a community? I mean, you have some way to identify core characteristics of the subjects whom make the reviews, and if you can't do that, how can you trust them?
Yes, this again. I ask my self what is the process for approving extensions deployment, because they are dangerous. This is so obvious that I still can believe that Google can't catch (most of) them. Sometimes you try to believe that malicious extensions are very few, but then these news hit the ecosystem. Time for a reality check.
Six countries: the bad guys of the movies, exception was Ecuador, allied country with an illegitimate government backed by Trump administration.
Why nobody in USA wants to investigate the accounts that helped with military-civil coup in Bolivia against Morales by a bunch of racist and neonazis backed by US ambassador, or their intervention in Brazil against Lula Da Silva and Dilma Rousseff. Hypocrisy.
Someone have mentioned spam after being forced to provide his/her phone number to Twitter, and I have known of similar cases in 2019. I also remember a case where the police matched a twitter handle to a phone number and proceeded to arrest a guy who have been a strong activist against electronic vote. So I can conclude that this bug was well known at the beginnings of 2019.
Having read about anonymization techniques I have started to believe that definitions of anonymity and pseudo-anonymity are well settle by now but criteria that contributes to the invariants for performing data transformation are not, so the result is that this criteria fail to guide the implementations of the transformations.
You keep data because data is economically valuable, but even when you care enough to implement some techniques that depends on the invariants you still fail to achieve something the better because of scale and because you don't want to refine the techniques. This also means that somehow somebody may have a technique that, provided enough pieces of data, can reverse you transformation.
Yes. Ans if you ask someone if that is bad they'll reply "No, that's how it works". There's no crime or illegal thing when you consider the activities from the inside, in this culture some people even deny its existence.