I didn't fully understand the author there. Was their point that the activity of "axe throwing" is silly or that it is silly to do that on a first date?
Personally I've never done axe throwing but I think it probably doesn't matter at all what activity is being done on a first date, as long as it helps break the ice. Also... it is the real world. Those people are probably subjectively speaking much closer to experiencing the real world than George Hotz, it's just not a world he necessarily wants to accept.
What is interesting about it for me is: why would someone working on AI ethics choose to work for Google at all?
Did she really think Google cares about ethics? Such positions seem purely performative, we all know that ethics go out the window first to make room for more profits.
They're pushing hard for a unified platform. For WhatsApps new username feature one can only choose from usernames not already used on instagram or facebook.
I can imagine that but I don't have those issues with the default config. So it allows using docker compose with podman directly.
On the other hand I could see it being hard for people to only install the cli part of docker. Luckily on arch that was simple due to how it's packaged.
As a student, I have no issue doing oral exams or written exams without notes. I mean I'm there to learn and out of curiosity so I like that challenge...
I truly don't understand how people can sign up for a degree and then have to cheat? Must feel torturous to endure a class you're not even interested in.
Well... again, I'm giving the LLM total freedom to destroy what's there and start from scratch. That could nudge it to structure the code base more like that.
It would be totally different if I told that to a junior developer.
But imo LLMs don't really structure code well or as well as humans could.
Whenever I let these tools look at existing repos they are too influenced by what's already there.
I could even say "feel free to completely refactor or rewrite anything" and they'll still just do small performative changes.
I've now changed my workflow to only using AI for prototyping and rewriting by hand once I can see something is viable. Takes longer but the results are always much better.
I disagree. There's a reason why PDFs are used and it's related to long term archival. They will probably still be able to be opened years later and look the same.
By all means the format has many flaws and isn't very machine readable but it's good at that one thing.
Because the behaviour of software changes over the time of development and that's how many bugs happen in the first place.
Especially if you use AI, let's say you have it implement a feature and then change your mind. In my experience AI makes as many if not more bugs than a human.
While we're at it, does anyone else want something like a good LSP but for assembly?
I mean one that infers as much context as possible and tries to help as much as possible.
This has to be assembler specific of course. For example, I use fasm which has higher level macros. An LSP could suggest struct fields and other stuff.
I wonder if it supports opening invisible browser windows and doing things like intercepting cookies. In my desktop application I leverage a hidden browser window to manage auth state and use it like a proxy for the rest of the application. Might try to port it to deno desktop.
Personally I've never done axe throwing but I think it probably doesn't matter at all what activity is being done on a first date, as long as it helps break the ice. Also... it is the real world. Those people are probably subjectively speaking much closer to experiencing the real world than George Hotz, it's just not a world he necessarily wants to accept.