HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

twisterius

no profile record

comments

twisterius
·4개월 전·discuss
[dead]
twisterius
·6개월 전·discuss
[dead]
twisterius
·7개월 전·discuss
[flagged]
twisterius
·10개월 전·discuss
How do you draw such a conclusion? Even an extremely progressive income tax cannot capture the earning channels that many wealthy individuals benefit from (especially when you consider unrealized gains and complex financial instruments).

Tariffs are a consumption tax. Wealthy individuals tend to leverage their wealth to spend more money.

Wealthy individuals own a larger share of businesses. Those businesses once again will bear the burden of these tariffs along with their consumers.

Compare this to a payroll tax. This is a direct tax that scales as a company’s employee base scales. This directly harms employees by decreasing their salary. It also decreases the number of employees a company can hire.

Compare this to a corporate income tax. This also increases prices and decreases employment. This is not much different than tariffs. However tariffs are targeted and create incentives to produce more within a nation (ie more domestic jobs).

Tariffs also provide a counterbalance against companies outsourcing (a technique that depresses domestic wages and encourages financial creativity to dodge federal taxes by establishing foreign based entities (eg Double Irish Agreement)
twisterius
·11개월 전·discuss
[dead]
twisterius
·2년 전·discuss
[dead]
twisterius
·2년 전·discuss
[dead]