IMO, nowadays top-tier conference paper tends to focus too much on telling an interesting story. This makes researchers only show the surprising result in the paper. The unsurprising one is hardly mentioned.
However, the uninteresting part would definitely help others to not make the same mistake. The uninteresting result is still result (and contribution), isn't it?
A few weeks ago, we organized a competition and we asked the top 3 participants to send us their solution to our gmail. Two were using their own domains (.io and .su) and one was using Gmail. The two with their own domains just got in the spam folder, and without surprise that Gmail one survived.
"If you want to set up your own email domain rather than using Gmail, good luck."