Transferability depends on the way the models is set up, and moves on a scale.
Introspectable: given that you can ask unlimited "What if" questions models, we should be able to get a lot of insights into how the models work internally. And you can often design them to be introspectable as some performance or complexity cost. (if that's what you meant by introspectable).
I agree. It could be because our brains are used to the old style but there are some objective drawbacks.
The new style right aligns everything which is good for numbers but bad for text. Also, it might just be the screenshot, but the contrast is poorer and the column sizes aren't as fitted.
It's a pity, I would rather have a decent default than to customize every notebook.
This is great, I was doing my tax the other day and thinking "Why the f* don't they make it a web form with simple English terms".
Tiny suggestion: Add a page saying which countries it's available for. Since it had a 'roo' I and ~25M Australian will hope it supports Australia. t was obvious once I started the form but first I look for an about or faq page.
This is very important. When people talk about emulating/uploading human brains, they extrapolate computing power and scanning to a point ~2040 when we will have the capability. But guess what, we have the capacity to upload a roundworm now or a fly and have tried to, and we cannot.
Wy?
it seems that there is something we are missing and most likely it's the science.
tl;dr we need to understand brains better before we can upload a human or a fly, this kind of project will get us there.