I do the same for translated code. It's not creative work which is a prerequisite for being copyrightable.
And avoid relying on direct LLM output for actual work to make sure I don't accidentally include some regurgitated snippet from an incompatible license.
It helps that LLMs struggle to write good, idiomatic code in my language of choice.
I wish NATO would step in and annex the Russian region between Ukraine and Kazakhstan. It could become a new country rebuilt from modern standards. And permanently cuts Russian supply lines to the middle east.
Losing territory is the only thing Putin will see as a loss. That would force him to admit failure.
Fair point. Probably I should assert copyright on the translated work. In any case it ought to be part of the GPL. The current text is rather ambiguous.
Look for a "static site generator". Bearblog and Hugo are popular ones. Then you can host your site anywhere and don't have to worry about security problems.
The GPL isn't strict enough now that everyone has a copyright laundering machine at their disposal.
I've been experimenting with adding a "translation" clause in accordance with the GPL paragraph 7, where if by means of automatically translating the project to a different language (by transpiling or machine learning) the license is retained, but not necessarily the copyright.
So far I'm not happy with the results by Claude and ChatGPT. Probably I should talk to a lawyer.
The GPLv3 was largely invented to prevent tivoization, we need GPLv4 now to prevent copyright laundering.
I'm no physicist, this is just how I understood this thread; but AIUI it's better to think of the neutrino being in all three eigenstates simultaneously, and if any of the three "bump into something" then it collapses to just the one flavor.
And avoid relying on direct LLM output for actual work to make sure I don't accidentally include some regurgitated snippet from an incompatible license.
It helps that LLMs struggle to write good, idiomatic code in my language of choice.