I did a quick comparison of models a couple of months ago by giving it a MYTXTADV.BAS file and give them all the same prompt to create a sprite-based version of a text adventure game I wrote in Basic over 30 years ago.
It was interesting to see where the approaches were similar and where they diverged.
True about AI slop pre-AI. Before 2026 my LinkedIn feed was mostly about how to get rich buying real estate. AI is an improvement.
I would like to remove the AI-generated content and any low-effort content from my LinkedIn feed. There can be some great stuff in there but a lot of it isn't worth my attention. Probably going to explore some browser plugins with that because the algorithm doesn't seem to do the best job giving me content that is interesting to me. It may be giving me topics I enjoy reading about now (AI) but not the level of "thought leadership" I want. Substack is better for that these days.
I felt that Amazon had the best chance to step into the ticketing game as they have the platform that can handle the volume spikes (Cyber Monday). But tech infrastructure is only a part of the puzzle.
May be incompatible with OpenAI possibly becoming more PG-13 rated in the future?
I had thought this would be combined with OpenAI launching a set top box where you could talk to an AI avatar. Disney IP could have been skins to sell people for their AIs.
My thought was that messages need to be untrusted by default and the trusted input should be wrapped (with the UUID generated by the UX or API). And in this untrusted mode, only the trusted prompts would be allowed to ask for tool and file system access.
I wanted to say your insight about a consulting business is spot on.
I also recommend Founding Sales and think it would be worth the OP skimming.
Also, search for Steli Efti (founder of a CRM called Close) who has some great content for outbound sales. I thought he did a session for Y Combinator's Startup School but didn't just find it. But he has lots of great content and a bit of a hustle mentality.
I think it is going to be a set-top device that casts to the TV with built in sensors and a camera to enable you to FaceTime with your AI assistant/friend.
I saw this Carl Jung quote shared on Substack recently.
"Loneliness does not come from having no people around you, but from being unable to communicate the things that seem important to you"."
I'm using writing as an outlet for an active mind these days. Thoughts that seem important to me and need to come out even if there is nobody there to read them.
Agreed. I would love Plex (or PlexAmp and then cast) to have some built in visualizations. And I have no idea why some of those streaming EDM channels on YouTube aren't doing music visualizations rather than ten second loops of video.
You’re right (as someone a bit older but also with rose-tinted glasses).
There was a feeling of hope on the Internet at the time that this was a communication tool that would bring us all together. I do feel like some of that died around 9/11 but that it was Facebook and the algorithms that really killed it. That is where the Internet transitioned from being about showcasing the best of us to showcasing the worst of us. In the name of engagement.
Yes, a huge value of LLMs is having all three circles and moving all of that work into the background. (headless)
Boiling down all knowledge work to the following workflow:
Inputs -> Analysis -> Action
There would be value to just be able to put an LLM in a loop ("Go get inputs. Make decision. Take action.").
What I think is going to happen is that the human in the loop is going to end up being an engineer/super user who builds a program/workflow that uses the LLM for the Analysis with the Action step being launched externally from the LLM based on the LLM's response.
Inputs (Workflow calls LLM) -> Analysis (Inputs + Analysis Prompt + Instructions to return payload in specific format) -> Action (Check payload and take action)
It doesn't solve prompt injection but mitigates some of the risk while still leveraging AI to make business move cheaper and faster. (Quality being the factor other than Time and Cost for measuring a task and the factor I am not speaking to.)
Agree with you from the theoretical POV but, in practice, that means that any CRM that has been used to store an email is untrusted data. Basically, a business's most trusted data source is untrusted in the LLM context. Which feels like a bridge that is going to need to be crosssed as the alternative is to just use new data (with a clearly traced and entirely internal lineage).