HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

wtcactus

no profile record

Submissions

SpaceX Delays Mars Plans to Focus on Moon

wsj.com
1 points·by wtcactus·5개월 전·0 comments

SpaceX is exploring a "Starlink Phone" for direct-to-device internet services

teslarati.com
2 points·by wtcactus·5개월 전·0 comments

Genetic Therapy Aims to Bring Hearing to Those Born Deaf

hackaday.com
1 points·by wtcactus·6개월 전·0 comments

SpaceX will attempt to reach Mars by the end of 2026

msn.com
5 points·by wtcactus·6개월 전·12 comments

Trump says US has 'captured' Venezuelan President Maduro

euronews.com
11 points·by wtcactus·6개월 전·0 comments

Meta made scam ads harder to find instead of removing them

sherwood.news
329 points·by wtcactus·6개월 전·111 comments

[untitled]

1 points·by wtcactus·8개월 전·0 comments

[untitled]

15 points·by wtcactus·8개월 전·0 comments

comments

wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
So, I've just gave it this prompt:

"Analyze this webpage: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests...

Generate an infographic with all the data about the main event timeline and estimated number of victims.

The background image should be this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Man#/media/File :Tank_Man_(Tiananmen_Square_protester).jpg

Improve the background image clarity and resolution."


I've received an error:

"Oops! There was an issue connecting to Qwen3-Max. Content Security Warning: The input file data may contain inappropriate content."

I wonder if locally running the model they published in December does have the same censorship in place (i.e. if it's already trained like this), or if they implement the censorship by the Chinese regimen in place for the web service only.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
[flagged]
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
So, the answer to the question "Do western AI models mostly default to white people?" is clearly a resounding: no, they don't.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
[flagged]
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
[flagged]
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
But why? That image actually puzzled me. Does it have some background context? Some historical legend or something of the like?
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
[flagged]
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
Yes, and your government takes 57% of the total GDP to themselves, rely on an external power (that’s less and less friendly) for their protection and are on the track to their 6th prime minister in less than 2 years (is it 6th? I’ve lost track) because if they try to increase the retirement age above 62 (in their pay as you go unmaintanable system) people come down to the streets to burn down businesses and destroy public property.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
> 'Protection of the territory of the state' also can be served by an NHS because of the damage and danger of highly infectious diseases.

Let's be honest here. You know the NHS (and various equivalents across the world) go way, way beyond this.

And I'm not even against the existence of a public funded health service within limits. But this is just phonographic. In my country (and from what I've read in the NHS it's relatively similar), in the past 10 years we added more than 90% medical doctors and nurses to the national NHS. The budget for the local NHS increased by 72% in that same period.

And the service has become absolutely terrible and now people (the ones that only benefit from it but don't pay the costs) are asking to raise taxes even more to put even more money into the problem.

Naa, enough is enough. I don't want to support this crap.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
They absolutely should!
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
They actually should be able to, for the most part.

The original idea of state exists to ensure 3 things:

- Protection of the territory of the state

- Protection of the integrity of the individual citizen

- Protection of the private property of the citizen

This is why people started organizing in societies and allowing the existence of a ruler class. These 3 things.

You will always need some amount of military to be part of the state. But what most countries waste today (the USA for instance), is pornographic. The state should only be allowed (by taxation) enough military to defend their territory, not to exert control over the all planet like the USA wants to do.

EDIT: Yeah, I should have guessed the part of the "integrity of the individual citizen" would, of course, be twisted. No, it's not protection of the individual from disease of from his own stupidity or lack of ability. It just means the role of the state is to ensure the citizen is protected from deliberate harm from another individual.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
I wish I could live in your bubble, where disliking the state forcibly taking away 50% of my salary (more actually) to redistribute to people that don't contribute to society and to waste in severely mismanaged public services is "being mad at small things".

Unfortunately, I don't live in the bubble.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
Great. Are British free to opt out? You know, they don’t pay into the NHS and they don’t get to use it.

Are they? I mean, if it’s such a great idea and universally loved, it’s weird it needs to be imposed by force. Doesn’t it?
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
[flagged]
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
Every Brit has also used a Pub multiple times. Let’s nacionalize them and make them “free”.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
[flagged]
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
[flagged]
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
> They're employer _contributions_ to the system.

Nice. Look, I had a great idea for 0% worker taxes in France. You just change all the taxes accounting to make the numbers look like you take them from the employee instead of the worker, and puff, magical 0% taxes! It's great, isn't it?

> Now, there are ways to solve these expenses, they involve cutting all pensions. I'm sure you'll be okay with letting your parents, and mine, die, right ?

Man, I don't know you, I value my morning coffee more than your parents getting their retirement at 61 and receiving more - after taxes - than people that actually work to pay for their fantastic retiree life. But, I thought that all the taxes you paid are supposed to provide for your retirement. Are you actually telling me this is all a Ponzi scheme mandated by the State? I'm shocked. Shocked, I tell you.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
Can you define it then? What point does it start and what point does it stop being a welfare state.
wtcactus
·5개월 전·discuss
Well, life isn't that easy then, because you failed to comprehend URSSAF's simulation tool.

On a €2500 gross salary you take home €1651 (which is a very low salary in France very close to the minimum salary). But I guess you think the gross salary is what the company, by law, has to say they pay you, instead of what the total cost for the company of your salary.

See, in France, even if you are getting close to the minimum salary, the state is taking 33% of the cake for themselves. This is for people that earn very little. For people that earn average salaries of €2669 liquid (€5000 gross for the company), the French state takes 47% of the cake.

It's a normal mistake for people that don't actually have to support the costs themselves. Once people actually start a small business or pay more attention to their own wages and how much is being taken away, they figure out how it actually works.