I feel like it's much more reasonable to blame the companies & people that are making it a necessity to have some sort of protection like Anubis for ruining the web (over-aggressive scrapers, bot farms, etc.), rather than blaming Anubis.
>My claim that statistically zero (cloud provider) customers are using valkey should, I sincerely hope, be self-evident.
I have no idea what the actual stats are. But no, I don't find your "statistically 0%" to be self-evident, especially in light of the other comments and links in this thread, and what I've heard elsewhere.
I was hoping, since you presented it so confidently, that you had something more than "trust me". In another comment you say you have evidence of marketshare, maybe you could post that?
Firefox unloads tabs that haven't recently been used, or as memory approaches system limits. You can also manually unload your least-recently-used loaded tab.
Seems like learning was done and fun was had, alongside some marketing content being produced. In turn, I got some learning done and some entertainment.
>There's no trace of a real person named Benjamin McIsserson
I don't think this has any bearing on the whether the story itself is fictitious or not. I imagine all of the real names have been substituted in all of the stories, to prevent any unnecessary conflict/drama/liability/etc.
A general rule of thumb I always used was to take take whatever the in-game population says and multiply it by 10 to get a closer match between the size/complexity of the city and what the population would more realistically be.
If I recall correctly, there was even a few mods that did a similar re-balancing of the population numbers in the first game.
The post your are replying to didn't say that punishment wasn't necessary, just that punishment and justice aren't really the same thing. Ideally he would be punished for his actions and there would be justice for the victims (i.e. being made whole).
Do you have any evidence that all parties provided informed consent? i.e. The consent form detailed out what could happen in the (somewhat likely) event the data is breached and how the data may be used? What other parties have access to the information and how that information is stored? How the information is transmitted? And they understood it all, with the attached implications?
Considering the only words the person who oversees both high schools had to say on record was that the technology is "fairly safe", I am somewhat doubting that the parents had a fully formed view of what the potential downfalls of the program are if/when it is breached or misused, or even malfunctions.
I think when we are dealing with advanced tech such as facial recognition it is analogous to the informed consent issues doctors face. How can someone possibly obtain informed consent from non-experts over something that requires years of schooling to understand?