My favorite Erlang Program (2013)(joearms.github.io)
joearms.github.io
My favorite Erlang Program (2013)
https://joearms.github.io/published/2013-11-21-My-favorite-erlang-program.html
19 comments
Following couple of short videos should interest you. How simple primitives can be used to build mechanisms. These are part of Erlang MOOC.
1. Joe talks about 'Turning Sequential Code Into Concurrent Code' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brklJ6yTH50&list=PLlML6SMLMR...
2. Next, 'Abstracting Patterns of Concurrency': https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvtrxeh8ZA8&list=PLlML6SMLMR...
1. Joe talks about 'Turning Sequential Code Into Concurrent Code' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brklJ6yTH50&list=PLlML6SMLMR...
2. Next, 'Abstracting Patterns of Concurrency': https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvtrxeh8ZA8&list=PLlML6SMLMR...
I hadn't seen those videos before, thanks.
Let me add one to the list: "The Soul of Erlang and Elixir • Saša Jurić" — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvBT4XBdoUE
I'm positive this video can turn any software engineer into a BEAM/OTP convert. It's one of my favourite demos.
Let me add one to the list: "The Soul of Erlang and Elixir • Saša Jurić" — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvBT4XBdoUE
I'm positive this video can turn any software engineer into a BEAM/OTP convert. It's one of my favourite demos.
I love this demo, it what got me to pick up Sasa's book.
I was attending a show and tell following seeing this where an engineer was trying to isolate failure of certain functions from the rest of the system and i sent this to them.
No idea if they watched it but i became an OTP evangelist in that moment
I was attending a show and tell following seeing this where an engineer was trying to isolate failure of certain functions from the rest of the system and i sent this to them.
No idea if they watched it but i became an OTP evangelist in that moment
APL should suit you down to the ground.
Learning array programming is something I'd like to do one day. Is there anything more approachable than APL and k?
I'm no APL programmer however like you want to learn it one day. I'm thinking BQN or J would be my preferred choices as they are open source.
I have been listening to arraycast podcast since it started though which is keeping me interested.
I have been listening to arraycast podcast since it started though which is keeping me interested.
My favorite APL book is “APL with a mathematical accent”.
>“What example program would best exemplify Erlang”
This should be more of a thing. When I see example code, I often see "Hello World", or tutorials which go through the primitives and other syntax.
What I want is a short program that shows the language doing something that it does well. Kotlin doing the job of lots of Java, JQ transforming JSON easier than trying to regex it, k doing insane things in 20 characters.
This should be more of a thing. When I see example code, I often see "Hello World", or tutorials which go through the primitives and other syntax.
What I want is a short program that shows the language doing something that it does well. Kotlin doing the job of lots of Java, JQ transforming JSON easier than trying to regex it, k doing insane things in 20 characters.
Tangentially related, since I had the (mis)fortune of having to write production code in 20+ languages over the years - not necessarily deep but not one-line-change-hackjob surface level either, more of the kind that requires to get to grips with fundamentals of the language at good enough level for code to be known reliable - I contemplated writing a series of articles about what made a given language feel like what it is at its core, how some syntax features, first-class items, data structures or object model, hierarchy design, conspire to make Ruby Rubyesque, Python pythonic, LISP lispy... reaching not to style, not to function, but to essence.
The end goal was not just theoretical but pragmatic, as giving in to the language and adapting my thought process seemed in my experience to increase productivity, reliability, and maintainability by several orders of magnitude, in connection with non-programming languages and linguistic relativity.
The end goal was not just theoretical but pragmatic, as giving in to the language and adapting my thought process seemed in my experience to increase productivity, reliability, and maintainability by several orders of magnitude, in connection with non-programming languages and linguistic relativity.
I would be interested in reading those if you wrote them!
We miss you, Joe!
When the 10x developer topic comes up, I think about people like Joe Armstrong or Peter Norvig.
They come up to solutions to problems that very few others would even think of. How many times more productive does a solution like this make Armstrong, compared to the median developer?
They come up to solutions to problems that very few others would even think of. How many times more productive does a solution like this make Armstrong, compared to the median developer?
There seems to be a tipping point where above the line a developer starts removing work and below the line work is created
why does this page need javascript to render anything? it's a static page...
Looks like the website is actually a thin layer of JavaScript that converts the blog post from markdown, injects it as HTML, and then renders the comments below it. Without JS the site is just a hidden textarea.
I'm not sure it's markdown specifically, seems to be a homegrown markup language, made by Joe himself. Here is the "renderer" part of the website: https://joearms.github.io/src/expander.js
> expander.js - a markup parser
> Hopefully the last JS I every write
> Very few regular expressions were used in the construction of this program
> No libraries were were used in the construction of this program
> All faults are mine and mine alone
> Appears to work :-)
Points to https://github.com/joearms/bookmaker which doesn't seem to exist anymore.
> expander.js - a markup parser
> Hopefully the last JS I every write
> Very few regular expressions were used in the construction of this program
> No libraries were were used in the construction of this program
> All faults are mine and mine alone
> Appears to work :-)
Points to https://github.com/joearms/bookmaker which doesn't seem to exist anymore.
Comment section.
Not sure where I'm going with this, I just think there is some kind of mathematical beauty when you can express complex ideas with as few symbols as possible. Writing a Universal Server in Java would be like writing a differential equation using only the four basic mathematical operation. Is that really ideal?