HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

GeertJohan

no profile record

Submissions

Dutch Government Claude Plugins

github.com
2 points·by GeertJohan·5 maanden geleden·1 comments

comments

GeertJohan
·3 maanden geleden·discuss
A Framework expansion card was also announced this week. https://frame.work/nl/en/products/wisdpi-10g-ethernet-expans...
GeertJohan
·5 maanden geleden·discuss
I'm well aware of the irony surrounding minio, adding a little bit more doesn't hurt :P
GeertJohan
·5 maanden geleden·discuss
That's a great list. I've just opened a pull request on the minio repository to add these to the list of alternatives.

https://github.com/minio/minio/pull/21746
GeertJohan
·5 maanden geleden·discuss
I used bubbletea for a while but quit it because of inconsistencies in the design. Went to ratatui and never looked back. Go and Bubbletea are nice, but rust is much more suited for building tuis.
GeertJohan
·5 maanden geleden·discuss
This is awesome! I love ratatui, having it available on embedded is very cool! I wonder if it will work with async on embedded e.g. embassy..
GeertJohan
·7 maanden geleden·discuss
They are great, although I wouldnt use the articles advice on using hashtext to get a number for the lock. This may cause collisions, especially when used with a large number of locks.

In a project Im working on we have a single go package that holds a list of all advisory lock numbers as constants.
GeertJohan
·9 maanden geleden·discuss
The EUPL isn't as explicit as AGPL.

> — ‘Distribution’ or ‘Communication’: any act of selling, giving, lending, renting, distributing, communicating, transmitting, or otherwise making available, online or offline, copies of the Work or providing access to its essential functionalities at the disposal of any other natural or legal person.
GeertJohan
·9 maanden geleden·discuss
I believe there is a problem/conflict with the networked-software clause and the EUPL's compatibility clause. It allows anyone to fork a project under the GPL license. When someone makes a fork of an EUPL project under the GPL license, they are then bypassing the extra conditions set out in the AGPL. I believe this to be a mistake/loophole in the EUPL. But I am not a lawyer so I really hope an actual legal expert can weigh in on this.