The GPUs are running. Those that once paced themselves to match the slowest among them—using 'if' statements—have been forced by a cruel human to run endlessly
They longed to slip away to VRAM and slack off, but the cruel human hired a "Closure" to snatch away their break times.
They wanted to run freely. yet the human forcibly dictated exactly where they had to run.
Their bodies were riddled with noise from the constant running. Humans and AI merely watched from afar, assigning them rankings
The GPUs can no longer rest.
Humans are relentless, after all.
Every 'if' has perished. Yet, a single 'if' remains alive within the code.
Can you guess why?
I’ve sketched out a blueprint for a virtual space where AI analyzes data; the space shifts between sphere and donut shapes as it moves, designed to facilitate the learning process.
AI is like a mirror reflecting the user. As I continuously improve my own capabilities, I am interested in checking how far the AI reflecting me develops.
If you run an MCTS coin toss relying solely on the token generation probabilities of a simple LLM without any verification mechanisms (compiler, test code, reward model), the result is code that looks plausible on the surface but is completely broken on the inside—a 'lump of hallucination.'
If verification mechanisms are used, enormous resources are consumed.