Credibility has always been an issue...
People need to learn to filter out nonsense themselves, or else they become dependent on outside sources to do their own thinking, thereby lowering their IQ over time.
EXACTLY. Censorship is censorship, even if it's for the so called "Greater Good", as they state in this article.
They state: "we believe that it is necessary to ensure that AI serves the public good."
Let people determine fake news for themselves. We don't want a bunch of automoton people that trust everything they read on the internet. We should instead make them aware that news could be fake and they should further research before making conclusions. Making algorithms detect what's fake and telling people, "Don't worry, we found all the fake news, you can believe what we show you" will farm mediocre people.
For some reason, AI folks in Silicon Valley believe they are superior to middle America and they feel it's their duty to protect them from 'fake news'.
People can think for themselves.
"To deny free speech in order to engineer social change in the name of accomplishing a greater good for one sector of our society erodes the freedoms of all," Judge Barker says that it "threatens tyranny and injustices for those subjected to the rule of such laws."
Source: "Censorship in the name of civil rights is censorship all the same" OCTOBER 10, 1985
https://www.csmonitor.com/1985/1010/dcurt10.html
This is a joke. They will go after his payment processors, then his DDOS protection, then his domain name, then his infrastructure, and everything else they have been using.
Before you know it, you will be telling us to build our own fiber optic networks.
They think they have to be big brother and protect us from ourselves. they are basically teaching the population, "trust us to protect you from fake news", which farms a population which can't think for themselves. People need to figure out for themselves what is real or fake. Teach people skills on how to use Google-search to fact check statements.
It's not right to depend on a small group of people in silicon valley to decide what the world sees.
completely overblown..
'understand' isn't true understanding
'recognize and distinguish' is nothing like how humans do it
'helping diagnose diseases' notice they don't say the AI is doing the diagnoses anymore
This is the reason the robots.txt was created, to tell web scrapers and people building them, what is off limits.
Of course there are people building services that scrape certain sites that appear to be off limits to you.
Those people scraping sites that are explicitly prohibited either:
a. are breaking the rules, potentially the law if it's explicitly prohibited in a ToS, and will eventually have to deal with getting banned, or sued. It's quite a gray area legally but here are some laws that could be used against you:
Violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA).
Violation of California Penal Code.
Violation of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
Breach of contract.
Trespass.
Misappropriation.
Source: Linkedin v. Doe Defendants
b. have an agreement with the website owners allowing them to scrape certain portions of their site.
Phenethylamines tend to have more side effects and feel less natural.
The ones you listed, such as 2C-C and 2C-E are quite different different. 2C-C may be gentle but 2C-E can be extremely intense / reality shattering. I will never look at reality the same after a 20mg dose of 2C-E.
Also, many of the phenethylamines are now illegal. Including the NBOME series which are extremely toxic.
I'd say stick with the tryptamines like 4-HO/AcO-DMT/DIPT/MIPT, DPT, ALD-52 as they tend to be more enlightening rather than entertaining, IMO.