> Wonder if this is what makes lawmakers consider some sensible gun regulation...
I can't comprehend why an average civilian would need license to keep and/or carry a firearm. None of the arguments seem to stack up, at least, from my perspective.
No conservative voice has value, in your mind? Surely there is a word of difference between a conservative voice and the voice of a confederacy advocate, or similar far-right voice?
Does conservative mean something different in the US?
To be clear, I did not say this is part of a larger coverup, as you seem to believe. I stated, quite clearly, I see no evidence that anything particularly strange has happened.
I suggested that a major tech firm banning content which challenges election results, not only this most recent election, would be considered a red flag if it were to happen anywhere else.
> We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. Presidential election.
How can any honest person accept this state of affairs? What would be the reaction of the gleefully censorious US big tech employees, many here on HN, if non-US social media giant enacted such measures in their locality?
I don't see evidence that the 2020 election stolen from the Republican candidate, but this is a huge red flag that something might be going on. It would absolutely be consdiered as such were this happening elsewhere.