I know this is innocent (maybe not) but who approved this at fb... maybe don't frame this as building AI that will capture kids attentions. Why does it even need to be framed like this... it could be stick figures or ANYTHING. Its comical.
You can rest assured that the true doom will come from a place you didn't plan for. The traditional pf knowledge is to diversify so that any number of events wont adversely affect your financial future. I think the future will present more channels of diversification from the traditional stock and bonds but the principles remain the same.
I think that's the challenging part about bias. If you can make that discrimination (no pun intended) then it's a feature which you can control.
The irony is that the black bias mentioned in this paper is probably due to inherent bias in image processing algorithms of the sensors themselves. Look up the "Shirley Card"
I'm impressed with OpenAI confronting this head on.
"Our model, despite being trained on a curated subset of the internet, still inherits its many unchecked biases and associations."
If these models find themselves into production environment - if they are good enough and profitable enough - they will eventually become legacy systems quietly perpetuating the biases of past times.
I have opinions on what the future looks like. I'd like to hear yours and see if there is overlap in our opinion of interesting customer segments and problem domains we could tackle together
Professionally, I am in leadership on the business side of a AI/ML start up. It's going well but I can't shake the feeling that I'm not actually solving any problem. I'm ready to take the dive on my own.
I would be interested in partnering with someone that considers themselves an Engineer regardless of what that looks like from an execution side.