I meant "best" in the sense of achieving some sort of maximum total utility, mean utility, median utility, etc.
My point is that instead of inspecting every economic relationship for "winners" and "losers", we should tax the winners and support the losers at a global level.
Ridesharing created a more or less competitive market for this slice of the transportation sector. Competitive markets are the best way to allocate resources. If you don't agree with that, it will be hard to have a productive discussion.
But if you do agree with that, shouldn't we resolve inequalities by directly supporting the least fortunate (with cash) rather than force parties into arbitrary economic relationships?
My point is that instead of inspecting every economic relationship for "winners" and "losers", we should tax the winners and support the losers at a global level.