> Are there any public, open, comprehensive datasets on flights?
Airlines and commercial aviation operators schedule their own flights.
That is a dynamic schedulle. So, perhaps there is no "comprehensive data set".
However, FlightAware makes publicly available scheduled and completed flight data over many routes in the USA. You can search by route and get a list of flights.
Flight information includes filed departure time, route of flight, and speed. For completed flights actual time, altitude, and route is shown. For example,
a search on the route Dallas/Fort Worth to Austin lists 45 flights.
If planning/designing a timing system like this using existing antenna,
why wouldn't you choose to use cellular base stations? The cellular
network reaches most places with overlapping coverage and carries network time. The lowest cellular frequencies are adjacent the upper broadcast TV channels.
Aren't modern cellular receivers what we call software defined radios? They
can choose which channels to receive.
The research looks detailed and interesting. However, I don't follow this summary article.
Digital circuits dissipate most of the energy charging and discharging capacitance. It must necessarily dissipate that as heat (except for a minor amount of electro-magnetic radiation). The interconnect resistance hardly matters. Of course RC relay can be a factor for some circuits. We can hope this reasearch leads to improvement there.
Power supply bus resistance can lead to voltage drops, but this research apparently studies layers much too thin for that application.
We don't see this replacing the memory-processor bus. That gives some indication of how ideal it is. I should add in my opinion memory interfaces are not ideal.
Everything is a trade off.
My read is "UVB" is the popular medicine way of saying UV is needed for the body to synthesize vitamin D. It was not considered necessary to point out part of the useful spectrum is in "UVC" territory.
I think this might be a good place to add this reminder:
"Vitamin D is made when UV (more precisely, UVB rays) react with a compound (7-dehydrocholesterol) in the skin. The best rays for UV synthesis have wavelengths between 270–300 nm." [1]
You have to start somewhere, and this probably has a place.
Still, having become accustomed to live acoustic music, I find this generated stuff not engaging. Maybe after a few more generations it will get there.
Looking at more of the presentations, we see that this not "How the National Airspace System Works". Rather it is the plan for a next generation system that the FAA hopes to implement.
If you have an interest in this you can see how things are intended to change. A lot of it looks like intended automation of work presently done by controllers. It appears there could be some challenges. For example, weather affects the flow, and what happens when you miss your pushback time?
There are many terms and acronyms. I am familiar with the user side of the system. Without this background I would have a hard time following the narrative. Even so
I find the descriptions unclear. I don't know of a good overview of the airspace system that does not also explain the rules of operation. I think those become too detailed for casual knowledge.