Let’s not forget the 98% “chance of winning” estimate of the 2016 election.
For months ahead of the election, the election was never called by The New York Times as being below a 90% certainty.
They were basically declaring a winner up front, and contributed to the spectacle of total upset.
Now as an outlet, it just spews shit on a daily basis. And I mean shit. It’s been unreadable since then.
The last time I observed good coverage on anything from The New York Times was during the first two years of the 2003 Iraq war. Since then, garbage. Hot garbage.
For months ahead of the election, the election was never called by The New York Times as being below a 90% certainty.
They were basically declaring a winner up front, and contributed to the spectacle of total upset.
Now as an outlet, it just spews shit on a daily basis. And I mean shit. It’s been unreadable since then.
The last time I observed good coverage on anything from The New York Times was during the first two years of the 2003 Iraq war. Since then, garbage. Hot garbage.