HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jamespropp

no profile record

Submissions

\Begin{Proof} Declaration

begin-proof.com
2 points·by jamespropp·vorige maand·1 comments

What early exponential growth can't tell us about runaway processes

1 points·by jamespropp·3 maanden geleden·0 comments

In Praise of Stupid Questions

mathenchant.wordpress.com
3 points·by jamespropp·4 maanden geleden·8 comments

Is Matrix Multiplication Ugly?

mathenchant.wordpress.com
161 points·by jamespropp·8 maanden geleden·110 comments

Picturing Mathematics

mathenchant.wordpress.com
109 points·by jamespropp·9 maanden geleden·4 comments

comments

jamespropp
·24 dagen geleden·discuss
Thanks for catching this! I fixed the error.
jamespropp
·24 dagen geleden·discuss
I added a sentence: “(Warning: This is sort of a trick question, so don’t expect a textbook-style answer!)” I hope that this will prevent others from being similarly frustrated.
jamespropp
·vorige maand·discuss
I plan to continue using AI tools, but to do so in a mindful way, to avoid becoming addicted to them, and to be prepared to back off if I don’t like the direction they take me in.
jamespropp
·4 maanden geleden·discuss
Perhaps an additional Moral is, if a calculation can be done in an afternoon, it's probably been done before. (I say this because it's been pointed out in the Comments section of my essay that Jon Lu asked and answered the same question back in 2016.)
jamespropp
·4 maanden geleden·discuss
I'm not sure I understand your question. Given that it takes an infinite amount of time to write down the decimal expansion of pi, what might it mean to compute pi in finite time?
jamespropp
·4 maanden geleden·discuss
Thanks for catching this! What was in my mind when I wrote the first of those two sentences was the entirety of my past experience using ChatGPT as a research tool, and all the times it made mistakes. (For a funny example, see my January 17, 2023 essay “Denominators and Doppelgängers” in which I describe ChatGPT's proof that .999... is less than 1.) But you're 100% right that the version of my essay that I posted last week didn't make this clear; I'll update it appropriately. I'll also add a brief description of ChatGPT's bibliographic blunder.
jamespropp
·4 maanden geleden·discuss
As usual, I'm most interested in comments that will help me improve the article, but feedback of every kind is welcome!
jamespropp
·8 maanden geleden·discuss
I’ve updated this passage. Let me know if the new version is clearer.
jamespropp
·8 maanden geleden·discuss
Thanks for pointing this out. I’ll work on this passage tomorrow.
jamespropp
·8 maanden geleden·discuss
Yes!
jamespropp
·8 maanden geleden·discuss
Do you disagree with my take or think I’m missing Witt’s point? I’d be happy to hear from people who disagree with me.