klustregrif

17 uur geledendiscuss

That’s a misconception. Glass does not flow over time; it is a rigid, amorphous solid. The uneven thickness seen in old cathedral windows is a result of historical manufacturing. Glass was spun into discs that naturally became thicker at the edges, and builders installed the heavier side at the bottom for stability. Physicists calculate that it would take longer than the age of the universe for room-temperature window glass to visibly deform under gravity. Reference: Zanotto, E. D. (1998). "Do cathedral glasses flow?" American Journal of Physics, https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19026

klustregrif

6 dagen geledendiscuss

The noice isn’t about the effect, it’s about trying to scale the outcome. We essentially have proof of a method that is significantly better than what is used with the broad population, but we cannot scale it to the broad population. That’s the “problem” in the two sigma problem.

And in general ongoing from “it’s obvious to me” to a quantized effect is always an effort. For instance I don’t believe you are correct in assuming that one would see a two sigma effect in physical exercise when comparing someone who attends a regular exercise course va someone who spends the same time with a personal trainer. Two sigma is a lot, and you won’t be lifting significantly heavier weights from hav a PT vs doing starting strength training. In my opinion you would most definitely see a two sigma effect from doing steroids though. But this is all pure speculation which underlines that part of the “noice” is about the documented aspect of the two sigma problem, where we have a body of data to work against not just personal assumptions. That said if anyone has studies on personal trainers va course work in fitness I’d love to see my world image challenged by data.

klustregrif

7 dagen geledendiscuss

A lot of pessimism in the comments, but I am just happy that we are seeing some work towards bridging the 2 Sigma gap for regular education vs. elite private tutoring. I can't imagine that people assume it's the physical presence of the tutor that is making the difference, it has to come down to the personalisation and expertise which is exactly what AI can provide in a form. And yea it might not be "there" yet. But if we don't start trying and studying then it'll never get there.

klustregrif

8 dagen geledendiscuss

Had this been a corporate environment the net saving by using one person partly and an agent as opposed to one person full time for the time it would take to implement this, would be a net saving enough to cover utilities, water and food for an entire village.

It’s silly to act like this was an added cost in a vacuum, or that any costs translate directly into charity for arbitrary families. Also in some place it would even cover rent for half a day.

klustregrif

11 dagen geledendiscuss

> I've had papers sit in peer review for two years, get rejected

And for people who aren't in academia, lets just say the unspoken part: While one or more of the reviewers are actively trying to replicate the work so they can beat you to submission after rejecting you.

klustregrif

16 dagen geledendiscuss

You are trying to kidnap what I have rightfully stolen, and I think it quite ungentlemanly!

klustregrif

20 dagen geledendiscuss

> Oh so she cares about her own privacy?

She didn’t choose to make that move. PET (the equivalent of FBI) made the decision to protect her address. I’m sure she much prefer the time back when she was living at her own place and her address was freely available to the public without any issues.

There is no hypocrisy here. As for releasing social security numbers of people, she’s against it no matter who’s doing the doxing and who the target is. But yes, obviously the government knows hos government issued ID corresponds to who. That’s pretty obvious. But that doesn’t mean everyone in the country has to have access to it. Your doctor also has access to your medical journal, that doesn’t give you the right to publish the medical journal of your doctor on Facebook if you get angry at him for giving you a bad diagnosis.

klustregrif

20 dagen geledendiscuss

By what metric? The fact that he got arrested for stalking the prime ministers children and releasing private information speaks toward protecting privacy not an issue if lacking privacy.

You can’t just declare “I am an anti violence activist” then go out and beat up politicians and declare that the system has a problem with violence when you get arrested.

This is the equivalent of what he’s done. He claims to support privacy laws so he violated the privacy of someone who is currently protected by the PET (equivalent of FBI) due to safety concerns and he proudly proclaimed that he did so by stalking her children. He’s not a political activist he’s a drug dealer who’s hell bent on getting revenge on politicians because he just spent 8 months in jail after being convicted on counts of death threats harassment and illegal possession of arms and drugs.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

Success in what exactly? There a very strong political movement in Denmark towards protecting privacy rights, then there’s this nutjob who just got out of jail for bribes, harassment, death threats against politicians and immediately he starts stalking the kids of the prime minister.

He’s not doing anything for the cause he claims to fight for. He’s doesn’t want a right to privacy he wants to be allowed to continue to sell drugs “in private” from the government. And he thinks freedom of speech should cover his freedom to harass and threaten politicians which it doesn’t and shouldn’t.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

Scenario: cop does cocain on the job and allows friends to sell drugs without enforcing the law.

Me: that’s kind of fucked up and not activism.

You: So you support Hitler!?!

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

I think you’ve got his fake activism mixed up. When he was a cop he wasn’t claiming to be a privacy advocates his stick then was that cops should be allowed to do cocain while on the job and that if a cop though selling drugs was ok they should be free to not uphold the law whenever they felt like it.

His fake stance on privacy came later when he faced consequences for doxing politicians and using the public Facebook pages of politics to advertise his drug peddling enterprise.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

I don’t have any non public information. This is all public record, he was found guilty and charged with jail on multiple occasions. He pops up in the news periodically for having broken yet another law and i charged and convicted for it.

And “being opposed to mass surveillance” and literally stalking kids of the prime minister to attempt to expose the PET (equivalent to FBI) exposed secret location her family is staying at are not the same.

Obviously every drug dealer is going to “be of the ideology that dealing drugs should be legal” but that doesn’t make dealing drugs activism. Same as abusing the office of being a cop. It doesn’t matter if you believe it should be legal for cops to beat up protestors, that doesn’t make a cop breaking the law to beat up protestors an act of activism.

The guy is just a sleezebag who cries “activism” every time he faces consequences for breaking the law in this illegal activism or when he’s harassing politicians. That’s not actual activism and he’s not supporting any cause he’s just acting like an idiot doing what he’s doing.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

He was saying that he broke the law routinely and they decided to end the investigation. That’s corruption, police should be investigated for routinely failing to do their job just the same as when they break the law or abuse their office.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

No, it’s not just unlisted number and address. PET (Danish equivalent of FBI) by administrative decision has had her move out of her Copenhagen apartment and to an undisclosed location due to security concerns. Her and her family are literally under protection due to security concerns and this guy is stalking her kids trying to dox her.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

> you could elaborate on the claims that be was a corrupt police officer and drug dealer.

This is public record. It’s entirely published he’s charged and received a prison sentence for the crime, the investigation into corruption started but needed early when he handed in his resignation. which is just proof that he was a corrupt cop in a corrupt system. I mean no drug dealer who gets charged is going to get off by going “ok I’ll quit then”.

> My understanding of his own account is that he left the force when he wasn't comfortable arresting people over weed

This flips the script. He public made statements that he would carry drugs on the job, and felt I’d should be legal, and that he wouldn’t enforce the drug law. The investigation that followed he handed in his resignation. And the corrupt Danish police force being what it is, dropped the investigation.

His “activism” has since consisted of amongst other things starting to sell drugs and then claiming that its activism when he got charged with prison for it. To be clear, he didn’t stage the public sale of a symbolic amount to get arrested and protest through civil disobedience. He straight up went breaking bad and started a drug peddling operation.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

This is Denmark not America, there is literally no risk to their life.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

The guy constantly does crazy shit so sure, but this comes days after he announced he was stalking her children, so it’s very likely connected

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

I don’t care if you think drugs should be legalized, or even if you do drugs in your free time. If you are a cop doing drugs while on duty and decide to take it on yourself to not enforce the law against drug dealers you are corrupt, because you have decided to subjugate the law you are forced with enforcing. Now it’s true that he wasn’t officially charged with taking kickbacks from the drug dealers he would let operate but in my optics that is entirely due to them letting him hand in a resignation to stop the investigation, propably to protect his fellow cops who would have been named and shamed for also doing drugs on the job. But to be clear, deciding to protect drug dealers in your job as a cop is. It activism it’s corruption.

Claiming it’s about ideology defies the point. He spent years as a cop letting drug dealers deal drugs and then came out saying the only reason he was breaking the law was because he didn’t believe in it. That’s not ideology that’s corruption. If he had decided to stop being a cop to not enforce a law he didn’t like that’s different. But that’s not what happened. He quit hen his illegal enterprise got caught. Cops do not get to enforce the law selectively based on what laws they like and dislike and get off just by claiming “ideology”.

klustregrif

21 dagen geledendiscuss

[flagged]

klustregrif

26 dagen geledendiscuss

What makes you say it’s unrelated? At my job currently the core bridge between AI and data goes through ChatGPT and databricks. Even before opening the article my first thought when seeing the title was “I wonder if this is useful for our AI”.

From the sound of it this is just another slight point of friction being removed and we’ll be able to run applications directly against “Postgres in databricks” with no need for ETL between the data and our business chat layer.

Nothing revolutionary, sure. But I have to admit I’m still getting used to the fact that we don’t need anyone developing analytical dashboards or designing sql queries for reports or investigations because you can just ask to get exactly the insights you want and everything gets done by AI, and this is just another step supporting that as the default desire path when building on databricks.