Yes, I think whether Uber or Lyft (esp. Uber) can pull off such big acquisitions before their IPOs is the big big question on how this market shakes out.
I really want to try this. I think easy car sharing could be huge and it'd be amazing to be rid of the hassle that is car ownership (monthly parking, insurance, maintenance, etc.)
Yes, but there's the same risk with conventional bikes on streets today. And cities like San Francisco agree - they are making it legal for adults to ride electric scooters _without_ helmets so that it matches regulation around bicycle helmets: https://la.curbed.com/2018/9/21/17884220/bird-lime-scooters-...
That is a legit concern. Hopefully, they engineer these scooters to be more durable over time. Also, hopefully user etiquette improves over time as well so people abuse these scooters less, resulting in far longer life spans.
Don't seawalls have a bad track record? I.e. the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster and New Orleans flooding in 2005 happened despite seawalls intended to prevent such incidents in both cases...
This new building is beautiful and is a great addition to the otherwise plain architecture of warehouse after warehouse around that part of Menlo Park.
Esp. like "Guido van Rossum does not like culy braces and invents Python, syntax choices were inspired by Monty Python and the Flying Circus." Python / Guido have a well-deserved placed in the pantheon of great programming languages.
Yes too much DRY can result in the wrong trade-offs. For example, change one line of code and, in certain cases, you may need to test all the places it's used. For UI, this can be challenging in certain cases because UI often has use case-specific quirks.
That said, I think erring on DRY is generally good. It's just that when one is a little more sophisticated, one should be more thoughtful about the trade-offs in certain cases.