I've traveled a fair amount of South America and kept giving people advice based on prices from 2018-2022. Wanted to actually verify whether that advice was still accurate. Medellin and Buenos Aires are the two that surprised me most.
There are ways of being non-accusatory, but also presenting the exit interviewer with food for thought. First, give a lot of genuine praise during the interview. You must have like something about the job, mention it. All of it. Next, explain the truth about why you're leaving and the problems you saw, but do it in a way that is as charitable as possible to the person(s) that are implicated. Avoid direct character insults. Acknowledge genuine reasons why that situation may have legitimately been happening. I believe there are ways to be mature and candid. And if you can do that, it's often possible not to burn any bridges, but to also reveal the truths you want to reveal.
This isn't true. You can certainly be prosecuted for committing crimes against enemies of the state. There's a reason we distinguish between law enforcement officials and civilians. Blur that line and things can get nasty.
One person had one issue issue with a single repair ticket. And then amongst a site of hundreds of thousands of users, some also put their single issues in the comments. So what? We could do this with any major tech company. And we do. It's not enough to change my behavior. I want to see the data.
I'd only recommend the Instant Pot for fatty, braise-friendly meats. It can be difficult to get lean meats/fishes right because of how intensely it's cooking.