You can get the un-redacted prompts via the OTel event logger[0], but unfortunately it won't give you responses. You could open up a GitHub issue to request that addition!
Disclaimer - I work at Anthropic but not on Claude Code, the team is responsive via GH issues though!
i have a rudimentary pipeline that takes in a ton of data, converts to json & markdown and then i used claude and o1 pro to generate the dashboard. That is to say, there are manual hops. How would you want it packaged / what would be useful?
This is neat - I built something in a similar vein recently but less productized, good work!
I have a habit of moving around (thus changing doctors) and a lack of a history / being able to easily consolidate them has been a reoccurring pain. I recently had a full physical while in Thailand and there was some potential concern around my labs & some imaging --- of course, without history it was a "check again in 6 months!" which prompted me to capitalize on Gemini's PDF parsing abilities...
I've observed given that LLM's inherently want to autocomplete, they're more inclined to keep complicating a solution than rewrite it because it was directionally bad. The most effective way i've found to combat this is to restart a session and prompt it such that it produces an efficient/optimal solution to the concrete problem... then give it the problematic code and ask it to refactor it accordingly
to play devils advocate, if that person had decided to go with $0 instead that there would be equally bad headlines/interpretations of "Instead of allocating the formulaic $1 we are entitled to inline with all other changes over X years, they squandered it on Y"?