HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

matheusd

no profile record

comments

matheusd
·4 maanden geleden·discuss
Unfortunately, it doesn't look like this is sufficient.

While I had great success with GrapheneOS in the past, bank apps in Brazil have started blocking it, even when the profile you run it under has Google services installed. So GrapheneOS (again, even with all Google Play Services and all other dependencies installed in a given profile) is still not completely transparent to apps.

This may be a coincidence (as I don't use it every day), but I noticed blocking started just as the recent Felca Law (which introduced mandatory age verification for every software, app and OS in Brazil) came into effect.
matheusd
·6 maanden geleden·discuss
How about this for an evaluation: Have this (trained-on-older-corpus) LLM propose experiments. We "play the role of nature" and inform it of the results of the experiments. It can then try to deduce the natural laws.

If we did this (to a good enough level of detail), would it be able to derive relativity? How large of an AI model would it have to be to successfully derive relativity (if it only had access to everything published up to 1904)?
matheusd
·9 maanden geleden·discuss
(Not op)

Maybe not you in particular, but I expect people to be more forthcoming in their writing towards LLMs vs a raw google search.

For example, a search of "nice places to live in" vs "I'm considering moving from my current country because I think I'm being politically harassed and I want to find nice places to live that align with my ideology of X, Y, Z".

I do agree that, after collecting enough search datapoints, one could piece together the second sentence from the first, and that this is more akin to a new instance of an already existing issue.

It's just that, by default I expect more information to be obtainable, more easily, from what people write to an LLM vs a search box.
matheusd
·9 maanden geleden·discuss
> Explains why RL helps. Base models never see their own outputs so they can't learn "this concept exists but I can't actually say it."

Say "Neuromancer" to the statue, that should set it free.
matheusd
·10 maanden geleden·discuss
> Humans are more efficient watt for watt than any AI ever invented.

Indeed they are. For now. The long term trend is not in our favor.
matheusd
·10 maanden geleden·discuss
> block cars in cities a couple of days per week, individually selected per person.

The net result in São Paulo (Brazil) for (something that approaches) this is that people end up buying a second vehicle.