HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

parkingrift

no profile record

comments

parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
Yes, and yes. It doesn’t prohibit natural classroom discussion at those younger ages. It doesn’t prohibit classroom instruction at all if it’s age appropriate.
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
Don’t talk about sexual topics in a manner that is not age appropriate?
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
No one is prohibited from having those discussions in an age appropriate manner.
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
Bandwidth is already charged by consumption. What you’re suggesting here is to the idea that vehicles should be charged based on what they’re transporting. Sorry but that is preposterous. Weight is weight and should be considered as such. No cost preference for shipment of products that some private company likes.
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
Yes. Unfortunately, we have to vote between two parties. When I vote I am typically voting for someone who I hope to agree with on 50% of the issues. There is no sane political party in the United States any longer. Pick your poison.
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
We're not really saving these species, anyway. Climate change will eventually come for them. We can either make a few hard choices now or watch as a few... hundred... thousand choices are made for us.
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
Seems that green Democrats would rather throw themselves into a volcano than accept anything less than their 100% absolute perfect solution.

New York keeps shutting down nuclear reactors... and then offsetting the power losses with natural gas. No one could have possibly predicted this?

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=47776

Congrats!
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
People use their personal phones with Stripe, Square, and Venmo. The only difference here is the lack of a terminal. It’s ultimately processed the same way.
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
Have you ever played Warzone? People sniping 700+ meters and they can't even see you on their screen. Obvious map hacks, aim bots, and even some hilarious shit like super speed or the ability to drive a car through walls to run you over.

Besides, it's not just a matter of improving accuracy. Elite players are elite in multiple facets of the game. Movement, general awareness, map awareness, accuracy, etc. Many of these metrics are easy to measure.

Cheaters will show up as outliers and it is at that point that their accounts should be manually reviewed.

With casual gaming I really don't even care if someone is "cheating" to improve so long as I feel the game was fair. I can put a red dot on my screen to improve my aim, as an example.
parkingrift
·4 jaar geleden·discuss
This is why anti-cheat should be performance based. Build a model based on the way that verified elite players play the game, and their performance. Compare “normal” players against the model and look for outliers. Manually review accounts that look suspicious.

Cheat behavior is obvious. Ridiculous long distance accuracy. Weird movement. Weird map awareness. Weird awareness of other players. Etc.