HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

quantumsequoia

no profile record

comments

quantumsequoia
·4 maanden geleden·discuss
Test
quantumsequoia
·9 maanden geleden·discuss
Most people overestimate the prevalence of malice, und underestimate the prevalence of incompetence
quantumsequoia
·10 maanden geleden·discuss
He's being a salesman, he wants to convince enterprises they need Box AI
quantumsequoia
·11 maanden geleden·discuss
"Everyone" as in financial companies and governments
quantumsequoia
·11 maanden geleden·discuss
Nothing aspires to be Apple. They're all about design. I can't see them getting invested in a nerdy philosophical cause like this
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
Can you sue someone for violating TOS? It's not illegal, and Apple doesn't have any damages.

Terms of Service are just... the terms you need to follow in exchange for service. If you violate the terms, you get cut off from service... which they already did
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
Interestingly, in the groupchat I'm in (N=67, mostly software engineers in the Bay Area), I've noticed a high correlation between people taking Pro-Beeper and Pro-Palestine stances, and those taking Pro-Apple and Pro-Israel stances
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
iMessage isn't dominant because it's "better". It's dominant because it's the default. Doesn't matter how good a chat app is, iMessage users aren't going to switch
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
Considering beeper is coming after Google's closed chat networks too, I doubt it.
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
What grounds can they sue them on?
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
Beeper's ultimate goal is to promote the Matrix protocol, and bridge proprietary networks to the open protocol
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
Do you get 2FA codes when logging in from am actual Apple device? Because it might be an issue with how your apple account is set up to do 2FA that has nothing to do with beeper
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
Sue them on what grounds?
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
SMS doesn't support emoji reactions, read receipts, typing indicators, high quality pictures/video, or groupchats over 10 people. These are deal-breaker for anyone that texts regularly
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
> it uses the exact same authorization mechanism as a real iOS device and grants the user access to no more than a real device would.

And a hacker that social engineers someone's bank password is entering just like the account owner would. "Hacking" doesn't have to involve exploiting a technical vulnerability. It's just unauthorized system access, regardless of methodology
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
> but the solution is to get everyone to use a different chat app

And how do you do that?
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
I had to purchase an iPhone solely to use iMessage. Believe me, I would have loved to use any other internet-based chat app. But I just can't move my entire social circle to a different app. The network effects and friction are too high.

The only thing end users really have control over is their own client. I don't know if they'll succeed in the long run, but I'm really rooting for beeper
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
None of the existing chat apps have established themselves as viable alternatives

Meta has trashed their privacy image so FB Messenger/WhatsApp non-starters for lots of Americans. Signal, telegram don't have enough PR, 90% of Americans have never heard of them. Kik was popular but died due to their financial trouble. Discord/Groupme have found success by marketing themselves towards particular niches, but people don't really think of them as general-purpose messaging apps
quantumsequoia
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
Many Americans have Facebook/WhatsApp accounts they haven't used in years. I'd be skeptical they surpass iMessage in terms of volume of messages