> nowadays all PhD students generally take something called “Responsible Conduct of Research”
I think that is a broad generalization. I never had to take an ethics in research course as a PhD student.
> falsifying data, plagiarism, how to ethically work in animal models ... image manipulation.
My take is that this may be a "field"-dependent class. My PhD is in a non-experimental field (math); thus, we cannot have these sorts of issues (minus plagiarism).
AES256 is still secure, assuming the encryption key has ~256 bits of entropy (32 random bytes). Assuming your master password is reasonably complex, hopefully the encryption key derived from your password has enough entropy.
Despite this, I recommend rotating all passwords (if you don't have the time, prioritize rotating passwords on important accounts / putting MFA on them). For all we know, lastpass might have had a full compromise (i.e. access to unencrypted vaults from malicious source code commits).
@utopcell do you have a reference for incremental FFT? I'm not sure if I understand what your implying.
Given a polynomial f(X), obtaining f's evaluations over the n-th roots of unity takes O(nlogn) using FFT. Are you stating that obtaining g(X) != f(X) evaluations over the n-th roots of unity should take O(n) time assuming some precomputation derived in the FFT for f?
I think that is a broad generalization. I never had to take an ethics in research course as a PhD student.
> falsifying data, plagiarism, how to ethically work in animal models ... image manipulation.
My take is that this may be a "field"-dependent class. My PhD is in a non-experimental field (math); thus, we cannot have these sorts of issues (minus plagiarism).