> shouldn’t we prioritize on skill instead of using a lottery
Why? It's not a prioritization based on employer needs or what employers want. Obviously if one has a degree they enjoy being a protected class, and if they don't have a degree they don't like being discriminated against. At least a lottery gave equal opportunity.
I also want to point out that this policy is not what companies want. They want the removal of sponsorship requirements and quotas. They generally want to be free to hire who they want.
> country has the right to determine what kind of immigrants it prefers
Yeah, obviously. You prefer we discriminate based on college education. Why? Don’t people without masters degrees deserve equal treatment? Equal opportunity?
> The country shouldn’t take in for employment a bunch of people it doesn’t need should it?
The country isn’t a person. If a company wants to hire someone, then obviously they do “need” them.
This is discrimination, and nothing to celebrate. People without degrees deserve equal treatment. People who want to work lower-paid jobs deserve equal treatment.
This is a sad day for the USA, as we move further from the principles that made us great.
This is discrimination, and nothing to celebrate. People without degrees deserve equal treatment. People who want to work lower-paid jobs deserve equal treatment.
America should stand for liberty, personal responsibility, and equality of opportunity. Not racism and elitism.
Our immigration laws continue to be a stain on this great nation.
It’s a joy to use. Fast, responsive, and reliable. No pointless redesigns or 10 second loading screens like gmail.