If you dig into importlib and try to write extensions for it then the underlying concepts of modules and packages will make a lot more sense.
For a project I was working on where you could dynamically call distributed tasks (we we're using ecs) I added a subclass of module and package that dynamically created package structures and modules from a database call.
So the new modules and packages would load from the database instead of from a python file and python the class would be dynamically generated to be something like albiet more advanced.
Class MyDistributedTask:
Def run(self, input, execution_engine=ecs):
Run task
So users of our package could import directly import their package_name.TaskName
And run it directly as long as they imported our package which contained a custom module loader to our db to discover.
That's because they had a cohesive narrative that fully encapsulated the political struggle of a republic aimed for the people vs a tyrannical dictatorship.
The new trilogy was devoid of anything except for woke virtual signaling and nostolgia.
And we computer scientists believe political vague statements with no evidence behind them why? It's not like there are dozens of cases of "intelligence" being wrong in the past 15 years...
Feel like this is all semantics. Sure the term "addiction" isn't fully applicable but the claim that because it's not addictive that there is nothing to the premise is spurious. I suggest everyone read the hacking of the American mind by Ronald lustig.
The article is right for the wrong reason psychology isn't science it's something much more important and goes beyond the dichotomy of science and "pseudoscience".
How can we trust our own rationalizations if our subjective experience of rationalization is flaws to begin with?
And how many men who are unbeknownst to you alone and completely struggling in the dating market have you seen but are conviently ignored for a couple flashy examples that stuck out in your mind?