HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

unaindz

no profile record

comments

unaindz
·6 maanden geleden·discuss
While technically true getting very close to failure is only useful if you don't need optimal results and lack the time to do more volume. The damage by going to failure will make high volumes maintained over time impossible.

Ideally you would leave 1-2 possible reps. I think it's important to train to failure to know your body and learn to gauge your reps to failure but other than that and very little time per week to train it's eventually counterproductive.

And if training with lower weights you tend to end very far from failure if just following a program without knowing what you are doing.
unaindz
·8 maanden geleden·discuss
Battleeye games get flooded with cheaters no matter what. On most anti cheats is the same anyways. Just see tarkov for a battleeye game with rampant cheaters
unaindz
·8 maanden geleden·discuss
How is it an adaptation? My understanding is that the internet era disrupts ADHD people the most.
unaindz
·11 maanden geleden·discuss
By definition if you aim to get autonomous that means you aim for zero or at least a very low intervention per mile. Tesla boast about that but doesn't provide.
unaindz
·vorig jaar·discuss
lol what?
unaindz
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
The "ads" on steam are so good that piracy websites use steam to recomend new releases.
unaindz
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
The steam drm is a joke and I think it's on purpose. It takes a few minutes to use a steam emulator and overcome it.
unaindz
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
It works on my machine
unaindz
·3 jaar geleden·discuss
There is value in that. One thing is tradition and one thing is media or history. I agree that traditions and culture should advance but by means of creating new things not overwritting existing ones.

The Wire would not be the wire without the accent, manerisms including slurs, drugs and police brutality.

Dazed & Confused would not be the same without the 70s issues and fortunes but you have the show Skins replacing those with the 2000 "revisions" or Euphoria with the 2020 ones. There is no need to rewrite any of those.

It could be argued that in movies like Blade Runner the rapey scene of Deckard and Rachel does not add anything to the story or characters. Ignoring the technical difficulty of changing those scenes without altering the story narrative or the character morals and flaws at the end of the day is a product of it's time with it's flaws.

In this case it was designed that way on purpose although I consider the reasons weak and it could have been done better if that was the intent. It doesn't help that the actress did not enjoy making the scene. https://youtu.be/vIdlYzbugT8?t=261

It can also be interpreted as Deckard being a lowlife scum that purposely rapes Rachel taking advantage of the fact that she is being hunted, he is the only one who is going to protect her and she knows it.

In this case maybe not you or me would care if the scene was rewritten but I'm sure someone trying to study older movies, a director or Harrison Ford cuestionable love scenes would if only the rewritten movie had survived.

If remakes add something to the table it's the ability to reimagine stories in a less flawed way by our standards without deleting the past.

TLDR; rewriting media is very nuanced and we should take the easy way out of remaking it or creating new stuff instead.