Haiku's not nearly as well-tested for security as most other OSes. We have a lot of the basic features (ASLR, NX bit, safety checks for kernel/userland data copies, some use-after-free detection in malloc, etc.) but things haven't been seriously audited or pentested the way other OSes are. We fix security bugs when they get found, but not too many people are looking for them that I know of.
> What do they mean by "infrastructure" here?
The web/internet infrastructure: software depot (has accounts for people to post ratings/reviews), forums, bug tracker, code review, etc. And it contains all the usual "sensitive personal data": IP addresses, email addresses, some private communications, and so on.
> If I'm happy with my Linux DE and so on, why would I choose Haiku?
Well, I guess the question is, are you really happy with your Linux DE? Because every time I've run desktop Linux, I have to spend what feels like 5-10% (or sometimes more) of my time fixing things that randomly break, or otherwise don't do or behave the way they're expected to, usually by finding some obscure configuration file and changing some random option.
On Haiku, since the system is designed and developed by one team, it all goes together in a way that Linux DEs can't really achieve. The downside is that, of course, we can't reuse much of the Linux's work (we have lots of Linux software ports, but the base system is all us), so we have a lot more to do than your average Linux distro, and so we're quite a ways from general feature parity with the Linux desktop (but the gap does decrease year over year, at least in some areas...)
What doesn't work about it? We have Ruby in the software repositories, and Ruby is required to build WebKit (and we build WebKit on Haiku), so clearly it works for that much at least. I don't see any open tickets at HaikuPorts about bugs in the port, either.
> Just as a nitpick: communities can (almost) never "get its act together", as they are comprised of people with different preferences who do not want to abandon their preferences for some abstract common good.
That seems to be a defining characteristic of Linux communities, anyway. Not sure how you can say "all" communities are like that.
> Example: Ctrl-Z. In a terminal, it suspends a process. In most GUI editors it performs undo. Shall we force a global standard?
Haiku uses Alt instead of Ctrl for shortcuts (similar to macOS and the Cmd key), so Alt+Z does undo and Ctrl+Z suspends a process, both in the Terminal. (If you want to use Windows-style keybindings, then it's the reverse, of course.)
> Am I missing something?
Haiku's not nearly as well-tested for security as most other OSes. We have a lot of the basic features (ASLR, NX bit, safety checks for kernel/userland data copies, some use-after-free detection in malloc, etc.) but things haven't been seriously audited or pentested the way other OSes are. We fix security bugs when they get found, but not too many people are looking for them that I know of.
> What do they mean by "infrastructure" here?
The web/internet infrastructure: software depot (has accounts for people to post ratings/reviews), forums, bug tracker, code review, etc. And it contains all the usual "sensitive personal data": IP addresses, email addresses, some private communications, and so on.
> If I'm happy with my Linux DE and so on, why would I choose Haiku?
Well, I guess the question is, are you really happy with your Linux DE? Because every time I've run desktop Linux, I have to spend what feels like 5-10% (or sometimes more) of my time fixing things that randomly break, or otherwise don't do or behave the way they're expected to, usually by finding some obscure configuration file and changing some random option.
On Haiku, since the system is designed and developed by one team, it all goes together in a way that Linux DEs can't really achieve. The downside is that, of course, we can't reuse much of the Linux's work (we have lots of Linux software ports, but the base system is all us), so we have a lot more to do than your average Linux distro, and so we're quite a ways from general feature parity with the Linux desktop (but the gap does decrease year over year, at least in some areas...)