RegExr: Learn, Build, and Test RegEx(regexr.com)
regexr.com
RegExr: Learn, Build, and Test RegEx
http://regexr.com/
32 comments
For those not aware of all the alternative online regex testers out there... I prefer regex101.com because of the better color coding. I previously made a snippet demonstrating that benefit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9581225
Also regex101.com (and debuggex.com) have they're own PCRE implementation, which is really useful if you need something other than JS regexes.
Sometimes I wonder if these online tools mine data on text blobs and regex we pass in. I can only imagine how potential IP could be leaked if the data was correlated to a company that the user is using the tool from. Has anyone done analysis to see whether to tools send data back to the servers? In theory the entire app should be client side only.
They probably don't but still kind of hard to be sure. In principle they could introduce it at any given time without anyone noticing for a while. Of course, once someone does notice, the shit will hit the fan.
Anyway, I share your nagging doubt and I'd never paste any text containing sensitive information into any text pane on a web page, not regexr, not JSON formatters, not anywhere.
Anyway, I share your nagging doubt and I'd never paste any text containing sensitive information into any text pane on a web page, not regexr, not JSON formatters, not anywhere.
I've never felt comfortable with password strength tools online for similar reasons. Sure, most (maybe all) are local Javascript, but still.
Can you not monitor networking and make sure nothing is being sent back?
Second that, because it supports different flavors of regex (pcre, javascript, python).
I use regexhero.net for .NET regex support.
I use regexhero.net for .NET regex support.
>I use regexhero.net for .NET regex support.
So far, I've been using regex101 even for building C# .NET regex because I haven't needed Microsoft-specific behavior.
That regexhero.net is an interesting link. I would have preferred that the website built a .NET compatible engine by extracting the actual source code[1] available from Microsoft. That way, it wouldn't require using the Silverlight plugin. However, I understand why Silverlight would be the easiest way.
[1] https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#System/regex/system/t...
and may also use transpiler: https://www.google.com/search?q=C%23+to+javascript+transpile...
So far, I've been using regex101 even for building C# .NET regex because I haven't needed Microsoft-specific behavior.
That regexhero.net is an interesting link. I would have preferred that the website built a .NET compatible engine by extracting the actual source code[1] available from Microsoft. That way, it wouldn't require using the Silverlight plugin. However, I understand why Silverlight would be the easiest way.
[1] https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#System/regex/system/t...
and may also use transpiler: https://www.google.com/search?q=C%23+to+javascript+transpile...
I think the easier solution would be simply to write your tester in one of the .NET languages...
That seems to be the approach http://regexstorm.net/tester took, at least. It's low frills (only highlights matches), but it's good for making sure that the problem really and truly isn't some weird regex quirk.
That seems to be the approach http://regexstorm.net/tester took, at least. It's low frills (only highlights matches), but it's good for making sure that the problem really and truly isn't some weird regex quirk.
Likewise, there's debuggex.com too to visualize your regex.
I use both for different reasons. (From memory I think one does replacements better) Both are fantastic tools. My first port of call when trapped with a tricky regex.
Seconding regex101.com -- it's really a wonderful tool.
second regex101. Been my goto for several years.
My favorite of these, because it's the simplest:
"As an aside, it's easy to test your understanding of regular expressions interactively: the program
From the classic book "The Awk Programming Language" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13451454).
"As an aside, it's easy to test your understanding of regular expressions interactively: the program
$1 ~ $2
From the classic book "The Awk Programming Language" (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13451454).
Online regex testers are nice but nothing beats RegexBuddy [1] IMO. I have fond memories of me using it while on high school to naively parse HTML using regular expressions only. Good times.
[1] http://www.regexbuddy.com/
[1] http://www.regexbuddy.com/
Came here to promote RegexBuddy myself. It's the one thing I truly miss in my transition from Windows to Mac. I run it in WineBottler[1] now and it works well enough but I'd pay good money for a native Mac version.
1: http://jdon.at/HpTd+
1: http://jdon.at/HpTd+
i love regexbuddy. I made a similar app (regexpixie.com, windows exe) that also uses the blue-yellow coloring to differentiate between matches.
The biggest difference is that RegexPixie has really good support for named groups. Frankly, it's beyond me why people don't use named groups for regex documentation.
The biggest difference is that RegexPixie has really good support for named groups. Frankly, it's beyond me why people don't use named groups for regex documentation.
I use Regexbuddy as well. It's awesome. I couldn't however figure out how to use Regexmagic.
Isn't this a repost? I discovered this tool a long time ago from HN and it has been invaluable to me. I always open it up when I need to construct regular expressions..
It's my second go-to programming website, the first being devdocs.io -- which if you don't know about, you're welcome! (all the api docs loaded offline)
It's my second go-to programming website, the first being devdocs.io -- which if you don't know about, you're welcome! (all the api docs loaded offline)
devdocs.io is not only a fantastic resource, but a very well run FOSS project and a pretty damn good example of a well working web-app.
Wow never heard of devdocs.io. Really cool resource for getting up and running quickly on new frameworks and languages.
I just started dabbling in writing a major mode for Emacs and found there is a great mode build in for testing Emacs regex. If you use Emacs, open a file and then start the mode with "M-x re-builder". You can type regex in the input buffer and see it highlighting in real time. It's pretty slick.
Complement with https://www.debuggex.com to also get an interactive finite automata (this can really help with understanding what's going on)
Not really a learning resource but more of general purpose tool which includes support for Regex searching as well as a number of other operations is: https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/
It's got some decent built-in regex examples such as IP addresses, email addresses, dates, etc.
It's got some decent built-in regex examples such as IP addresses, email addresses, dates, etc.
Seems broken. It doesn't implement a proper regular expression engine.
http://regexr.com/3f8ge
c.f. https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html
http://regexr.com/3f8ge
c.f. https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html
I've been using Regex Coach at http://www.weitz.de/regex-coach/ for quite some time. This is a standalone tool on windows. An older release is available for Linux.
[deleted]
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems.
- Jamie Zawinski
- Jamie Zawinski
Why is this on HN? It's literally the first result you get if you Google regex.
for visualizing regular expressions i recommend https://regexper.com/#foo%20%5Ba-z%5D%2B%20bar