Feds take down $1B Medicare fraud scheme(nbcnews.com)
nbcnews.com
Feds take down $1B Medicare fraud scheme
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/feds-take-down-1-billion-fraud-scheme-operation-brace-yourself-n992481
30 comments
> "The unwanted products could disqualify them from receiving a brace under Medicare if they need one in the future, prosecutors said."
I read an implied "if we hadn't caught the fraudsters" into that sentence.
As in "if we hadn't realized these braces were fraudulent, patients would have been denied braces they needed because they already reached the maximum number of annual braces covered by Medicare."
I read an implied "if we hadn't caught the fraudsters" into that sentence.
As in "if we hadn't realized these braces were fraudulent, patients would have been denied braces they needed because they already reached the maximum number of annual braces covered by Medicare."
|It's like an idiot going to jail for "SWATing" someone but where the SWAT team can still bust down doors and kill based on random tips.
Or getting the wrong house. Remember kids: Limited Immunity means complete immunity!
Or getting the wrong house. Remember kids: Limited Immunity means complete immunity!
If they get the wrong house, there’s always the possibility of them being shot and killed with no recourse. Any lawyer worth their weight in potato chips could get charges lifted from someone who guns down unidentifiable armed intruders entering their home unexpectedly.
Right, but if they gun you down, there's not much that's likely to happen. They might have to get a job in a different city.
*Edit: Also, not every city has stand your ground laws. And there's nothing stopping them from shooting back and killing you. They're expecting a fight anyway. The lawyer might get a settlement for your family, but you'll still be dead. And your dog too; they love shooting dogs.
*Edit: Also, not every city has stand your ground laws. And there's nothing stopping them from shooting back and killing you. They're expecting a fight anyway. The lawyer might get a settlement for your family, but you'll still be dead. And your dog too; they love shooting dogs.
Not to mention that the government initially ignored a huge amount of complaints before finally investigating.
And people in the USA are ok with these. That is the most alarming thing for me.
Ah, so that’s why I’ve been getting so many robocalls that start with “You’ve been qualified to receive a medical-grade brace”.
Everytime they called me I would try to keep the conversation going telling them I had pain, and then explained that I had a pain in the arse from them calling me all the time.
Ironically I just got one of these calls yesterday saying it was my "final chance" to receive my medical-grade brace.
Final chance indeed.
Final chance indeed.
I'm starting to understand why medicare is going bankrupt... Glad these guys got caught and taken down.
Medicare is notorious for being rife with fraud and waste. This ring is far from the only one.
This includes mom-and-pop doctors who “upcode” certain procedure codes so that they get paid more. There’s obviously very little the govt can do to check or know. That kind of stuff happens all the time. Like I wonder if the govt is even doing basic anomaly detection on claims data to catch these things...if a ring is getting away with $1bil it makes me think no.
Also...there got to be so much opportunity to build a company around selling a DS tool to the government or insurance companies to help detect and stop medical fraud.
This includes mom-and-pop doctors who “upcode” certain procedure codes so that they get paid more. There’s obviously very little the govt can do to check or know. That kind of stuff happens all the time. Like I wonder if the govt is even doing basic anomaly detection on claims data to catch these things...if a ring is getting away with $1bil it makes me think no.
Also...there got to be so much opportunity to build a company around selling a DS tool to the government or insurance companies to help detect and stop medical fraud.
> a DS tool to the government or insurance companies
Insurance companies have actual fraud departments with investigators clinging onto every hint of over-prescribing, over-billing, over-testing or repeat visit inflation.
Medicare, on the other hand, has low administrative expense that's constantly touted as some kind of incredible achievement when compared to those "bloated" private insurers.
Insurance companies have actual fraud departments with investigators clinging onto every hint of over-prescribing, over-billing, over-testing or repeat visit inflation.
Medicare, on the other hand, has low administrative expense that's constantly touted as some kind of incredible achievement when compared to those "bloated" private insurers.
Health insurers are among the most inept, bloated bureaucratic institutions in the United States. Even without the built in inefficiency that comes with having your program-level capability micromanaged by Congress, they suck at fraud protection and spend a lot of time on subrogation and dependent audits. Their incentive is to deny, disqualify, and delay to defer expense, preferably into the next plan year.
Medicare has some of the power of government procurement and enforcement behind it. They pay for outcomes, not procedures, which addresses many common frauds and provides a strong discouragement for unnecessary procedures. The holes are usually around equipment and prescriptions... and the issue there is a governance issue at the congressional level.
Medicare has some of the power of government procurement and enforcement behind it. They pay for outcomes, not procedures, which addresses many common frauds and provides a strong discouragement for unnecessary procedures. The holes are usually around equipment and prescriptions... and the issue there is a governance issue at the congressional level.
In fact fradulent spending increase the total spend so it lowers the administrative expense.
Isnt the 80/20 rule is a disincentive for insurance companies to go after fraud?
Theoretically, a competing insurance company that reduces fraud can offer lower premiums. In reality, this is thwarted by having significant portions of the population locked up in employer provided health insurance so they can’t shop around, although the employer is sort of shopping around for them. It would be much better if everyone was dropped onto healthcare.gov.
>> There’s obviously very little the govt can do to check or know
This is exactly why the government should not sponsor billion dollar projects. If they had a direct relationship between patients and medical providers and insurer and insured it would be much harder to create these sort of schemes.
Netherlands has interesting progress:
https://nltimes.nl/2016/09/14/netherlands-gives-insurers-acc...
"The idea is to help insurers lower the damage suffered by fraudulent claims, an amount of 11 million euros last year. According to Privacy Barometer, the vast majority of that damage can be attributed to fraud committed by healthcare providers or intermediaries. Patients themselves are only responsible for 1.4 million of the 11 million euros in health insurance fraud."
This is exactly why the government should not sponsor billion dollar projects. If they had a direct relationship between patients and medical providers and insurer and insured it would be much harder to create these sort of schemes.
Netherlands has interesting progress:
https://nltimes.nl/2016/09/14/netherlands-gives-insurers-acc...
"The idea is to help insurers lower the damage suffered by fraudulent claims, an amount of 11 million euros last year. According to Privacy Barometer, the vast majority of that damage can be attributed to fraud committed by healthcare providers or intermediaries. Patients themselves are only responsible for 1.4 million of the 11 million euros in health insurance fraud."
They do monitor for anomalies and swing deviations from routine patterns.
Ps I’m a provider.
Ps I’m a provider.
Yes the Government is doing something. Someone I knows spouse is a federal prosecutor. She works more like a data scientist than a lawyer. Not sure how they get cases but they claim it becomes pretty obvious once you start understanding Medicare codes.
I got the impression what they were doing was in no way automated except using excel to manipulate data. Maybe the doctors they review are flagged by some other system?
I got the impression what they were doing was in no way automated except using excel to manipulate data. Maybe the doctors they review are flagged by some other system?
My governor famously ran one!
With complexity comes opportunity.
What are the common signs of this and where should I submit a complaint if I see them? Our longtime family doctor seems to make way too much money doing what he does just giving standard health checkups to the elderly.
Why are the criminals not named?
The accused. A fine distinction to make in conversation perhaps, but an important one.
It's completely standard for those merely accused of crimes to have their names spread boldly across the news in America. Nothing protects the accused in the court of the press and public opinion. I assume if the accused aren't mentioned here, it's a matter of their having good public relations and good lawyers.
I assume it's because they can afford lawyers that actually requested the information be sealed until they're found guilty.
Agreed. But not always so consistent as usually we have names and photos, though I’m seeing it less and less lately.
They were charged, not convicted yet.
So Medicare knows this happened and is still willing to disqualify random people from getting braces? Really? I mean, I believe it but still, this is where we are folks.
It's like someone sued for "damaging" someone's credit, rather than just demanding that damaging information not being used. It's like an idiot going to jail for "SWATing" someone but where the SWAT team can still bust down doors and kill based on random tips.