Microsoft's Copilot is getting OpenAI's latest models and a new code interpreter(theverge.com)
theverge.com
Microsoft's Copilot is getting OpenAI's latest models and a new code interpreter
https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/5/23989052/microsoft-copilot-gpt-4-turbo-openai-models-code-interpreter-feature
19 comments
I’m working on something in this space that doesn’t exhibit the issues you mentioned, and it could potentially be useful to you.
Can I get in touch with you for a demo and to get your feedback?
Can I get in touch with you for a demo and to get your feedback?
Yeah happy to try it out.
Thanks a lot! I will reach out to you soon via the email on your profile.
Yeah, same with the recent paint integration they've previewed, it's just bad.
I suspect that Microsoft being Microsoft just wants to abuse GPT to drive more traffic/sales to their existing (shitty) products.
Give Microsoft AGI and they'll use it to program blow-up dolls that walk around telling everybody how great Teams/Bing/Azure is.
Give Microsoft AGI and they'll use it to program blow-up dolls that walk around telling everybody how great Teams/Bing/Azure is.
> they'll use it to program blow-up dolls that walk around telling everybody how great Teams is
And that's how we get Cylon Terminators.
And that's how we get Cylon Terminators.
Is there a specific reason to make a distinction between the two products (copilot/chatgpt+) when in the end, they are using the same engine.. ?
It is confusing me a bit (chatgpt+ subscriber here)
It is confusing me a bit (chatgpt+ subscriber here)
Plenty of custom system prompts for co-pilot probably.
The limited context window is a huge downside with Bing Ai
Having to start a new conversation every fifth message is such a bummer.
Having to start a new conversation every fifth message is such a bummer.
The five-message limit isn't a result of the context window, but an arbitrary constraint applied after early results of the Bing chatbot were, uh... troubling[0]?
0. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2023/02/16/microsoft-...
0. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2023/02/16/microsoft-...
It's more like every 30.
Is it the same copilot as Vscode copilot? It doesn't seems to be. Do Microsoft have another product called copilot?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Copilot#Microsoft_Co...
> March 16, 2023, Microsoft announced Microsoft 365 Copilot.[32][33] This tool, designed for Microsoft 365 applications and services, Edge, Microsoft Bing and Windows, leverages the advanced capabilities of OpenAI's GPT-4 large language models (LLMs). It also incorporates Microsoft Graph to transform user text input into content across various Microsoft 365 applications, including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams.
Not the same as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitHub_Copilot :
> GitHub Copilot (not to be confused with "Copilot X", the name of GitHub's "vision" for next-gen Copilot features[1]) is a cloud-based artificial intelligence tool developed by GitHub (owned by Microsoft) and OpenAI to assist users of Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, Neovim, and JetBrains integrated development environments (IDEs) by autocompleting code.
> March 16, 2023, Microsoft announced Microsoft 365 Copilot.[32][33] This tool, designed for Microsoft 365 applications and services, Edge, Microsoft Bing and Windows, leverages the advanced capabilities of OpenAI's GPT-4 large language models (LLMs). It also incorporates Microsoft Graph to transform user text input into content across various Microsoft 365 applications, including Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and Teams.
Not the same as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GitHub_Copilot :
> GitHub Copilot (not to be confused with "Copilot X", the name of GitHub's "vision" for next-gen Copilot features[1]) is a cloud-based artificial intelligence tool developed by GitHub (owned by Microsoft) and OpenAI to assist users of Visual Studio Code, Visual Studio, Neovim, and JetBrains integrated development environments (IDEs) by autocompleting code.
I think they are using copilot name for any AI assistant (bring back clippit ms!)
More than once I've had a long document open and I've been like, oh Edge has GPT now maybe it can give me a summary. It will read the page, produce something vague, I'll ask a follow up question and it will completely lose track of what we're doing and like search Bing for generic information not at all related to the webpage I'm on. It also seems inherently unable to say, "oh the page doesn't include that information" rather it just makes things up so I always end up just having to read the document myself.
It really feels like an LLM being slapped on for the sake of having one rather than trying to solve a real need. Which is super frustrating because I have a real need and this technology in theory could solve it.