Ask HN: Anyone else give up on trying to get rich?
40 comments
People who can never have enough money don't want the money. What they want is the dopamine hit they get every time they feel they have won. Money is the measuring stick they are using to keep track. No amount of money will make them happy. You can say the same about the elites in any field. It's not about the thing but about winning the competition.
Many of us will hit a point where what we have is enough. If we are lucky enough to hit that point then we will retire or keep doing what needs to be done to maintain that point. Looks like you hit that point. Good for you...
Many of us will hit a point where what we have is enough. If we are lucky enough to hit that point then we will retire or keep doing what needs to be done to maintain that point. Looks like you hit that point. Good for you...
I just want to have a dignified journey. Help those around me, be a little bit better everyday, and leave peacefully when it's time. Hoarding anything seems like a way to get attached and thus unable to face my curtains time gracefully.
Why would I care about getting “rich”? I’m 50. I work remotely, I have a great marriage and deep close personal friends, I’m
in pretty good shape, I’m well known and respected in
my niche, I travel as much as I want to and for extended period of times.
I’ve worked at one BigTech company (only for a little over 3 years ending a couple of years ago) and turned down opportunities to make almost six figures more than I make now because stress wasn’t worth it.
I’ve given up the big house in the burbs to live in a condo one third the size, more access to amenities and much better weather.
My short term needs are met in abundance and my long term needs are being addressed by putting money in investments every pay period.
I make good money by any objective measure - but it’s equivalent to slightly less than what a mid level developer makes in BigTech.
I figured out how to make money - go to work for 40 hours a week, get good in my niche and companies with money put some of that money in my account in exchange for labor.
I’ve worked at one BigTech company (only for a little over 3 years ending a couple of years ago) and turned down opportunities to make almost six figures more than I make now because stress wasn’t worth it.
I’ve given up the big house in the burbs to live in a condo one third the size, more access to amenities and much better weather.
My short term needs are met in abundance and my long term needs are being addressed by putting money in investments every pay period.
I make good money by any objective measure - but it’s equivalent to slightly less than what a mid level developer makes in BigTech.
I figured out how to make money - go to work for 40 hours a week, get good in my niche and companies with money put some of that money in my account in exchange for labor.
I gave up this year when I learned that I have a fatal disorder. There isn't enough time left to get rich. I don't recommend slacking off because you have plenty of time yet. Once your number comes up, it's too late.
I hate to sound like an asshole. But your lesson is from finding out time may be short is that you wished you had made more money?
Then don't sound like one.
Well it’s toxic for someone to think when they have a fatal disease - “I wish I could have been rich”.
Life has seasons.
There's a season for heat/fire.
There's a season for cooling off.
I'm in the same boat, where I've cooled off.
I think it's okay.
The other way to go increase energy and light a fire again.
There's a season for heat/fire.
There's a season for cooling off.
I'm in the same boat, where I've cooled off.
I think it's okay.
The other way to go increase energy and light a fire again.
A few years - and a couple babies - ago, I transitioned from education to implementation consulting. I have been doing very well at it, but I’m not an owner and won’t get rich. It’s a funny thing to feel very good about my time as an educator while also understanding the financial safety I gave up by doing so for ten years.
I would love to join a product team and build something more durable. Consulting is very transactional and fleeting.
I would love to join a product team and build something more durable. Consulting is very transactional and fleeting.
> Anyone else give up on trying to get rich?
How hard were you actually trying when you were trying to get rich? How close did you come to getting rich?
Why didn't you start a plumbing business or become a dentist or something?
Did you ever have a concrete definition of "rich" or was it always some nebulous "more" amount compared to what you had at any given time?
How hard were you actually trying when you were trying to get rich? How close did you come to getting rich?
Why didn't you start a plumbing business or become a dentist or something?
Did you ever have a concrete definition of "rich" or was it always some nebulous "more" amount compared to what you had at any given time?
I failed a few FAANG interviews.
E5s at Facebook make around 200k a year in pure stock. Assuming it grows in value, do that for a decade and your at 2.5 million or so.
Even after the taxes, that's enough to retire overseas.
Now I'm old. It didn't happen so I'm content to write code for a middle class wage
E5s at Facebook make around 200k a year in pure stock. Assuming it grows in value, do that for a decade and your at 2.5 million or so.
Even after the taxes, that's enough to retire overseas.
Now I'm old. It didn't happen so I'm content to write code for a middle class wage
So I guess you didn’t try very hard to get rich?
Eh.
I guess not a tbh. I really thought a FAANG job would have just fallen in my lap by now.
I guess not a tbh. I really thought a FAANG job would have just fallen in my lap by now.
Similar here. I have no desire to be super successful. I just want to feel like a valued member of the team and do good work. I want enough money to someday retire and work on some reasonably priced hobbies. It's weird, but it seems like even asking for this is asking a lot.
Building for fun what made me sleep well. I realised money is evil. It always brings bad crowd including your partner
Feeling a bit lost - if there are no jobs left in 5 years, what can I do etc?
With a family you can't make 1 year of savings last 5 or 10 by living very cheaply.
Many years ago when I took my current role I made a conscious decision to choose something that would grant me a good work-life balance. I wanted to check out at 4PM, not have to think about work after that, and do whatever I wanted.
Since making this decision I've become an expert in a number of hobbies, gotten married, had kids, and am now living a quite pleasant life. The financial freedom people aim for in retirement, the time, I have that already. I'm already living a care-free life, largely doing what I want.
I have a family member who is a multi-millionaire and who owns multiple businesses. He has more money now than I'll have in my lifetime. But I have something that he doesn't have - time. In my estimation time is a much more valuable commodity to obtain than money. If you can work your career so you have enough money, but also time, that's a more valuable goal than simply 'being rich'.
Money with no free time and boat load of stress is a shit life.
Since making this decision I've become an expert in a number of hobbies, gotten married, had kids, and am now living a quite pleasant life. The financial freedom people aim for in retirement, the time, I have that already. I'm already living a care-free life, largely doing what I want.
I have a family member who is a multi-millionaire and who owns multiple businesses. He has more money now than I'll have in my lifetime. But I have something that he doesn't have - time. In my estimation time is a much more valuable commodity to obtain than money. If you can work your career so you have enough money, but also time, that's a more valuable goal than simply 'being rich'.
Money with no free time and boat load of stress is a shit life.
> But I have something that he doesn't have - time
No, both of you have the exact same amount of time each day.
But it seems like he has more freedom in how he spends that time? It's just that you don't agree with how he chooses to use it? The reason I say that is that you say spend your time "largely doing what I want." Doesn't your rich relative spend ALL their time doing what they want?
No, both of you have the exact same amount of time each day.
But it seems like he has more freedom in how he spends that time? It's just that you don't agree with how he chooses to use it? The reason I say that is that you say spend your time "largely doing what I want." Doesn't your rich relative spend ALL their time doing what they want?
Nope. He is still dependent on his businesses to survive. It's a job for him just like it is for me. I have a boss, his businesses are his boss.
The difference is that I work far fewer, less stressful hours, and have much more time to myself.
That's not to say that all businesses turn our like that, but the point is that having more money doesn't necessarily mean you have a better lifestyle.
I can count a number of people who have more money than me but who have awful, stressful or tedious jobs.
The difference is that I work far fewer, less stressful hours, and have much more time to myself.
That's not to say that all businesses turn our like that, but the point is that having more money doesn't necessarily mean you have a better lifestyle.
I can count a number of people who have more money than me but who have awful, stressful or tedious jobs.
Yes.
> I have a family member who is a multi-millionaire and who owns multiple businesses. He has more money now than I'll have in my lifetime
Why can’t he sell the businesses or hire an operator to run them while he collects checks?
> The difference is that I work far fewer, less stressful hours, and have much more time to myself.
You both have 24 hours to yourself each day.
You choose to spend yours one way, he chooses to spend his in another.
> I have a family member who is a multi-millionaire and who owns multiple businesses. He has more money now than I'll have in my lifetime
Why can’t he sell the businesses or hire an operator to run them while he collects checks?
> The difference is that I work far fewer, less stressful hours, and have much more time to myself.
You both have 24 hours to yourself each day.
You choose to spend yours one way, he chooses to spend his in another.
Because then he risks the businesses failing and losing his livelihood.
On the second point, still nope. He took on the businesses for lack of a better option. It's true that it was a conscious choice, but my career path was actually harder to obtain, and more deliberate.
Not that there's anything wrong with being a business owner, but hopefully I'm making the point clear that there is more to the life equation than the quantity of money you make.
On the second point, still nope. He took on the businesses for lack of a better option. It's true that it was a conscious choice, but my career path was actually harder to obtain, and more deliberate.
Not that there's anything wrong with being a business owner, but hopefully I'm making the point clear that there is more to the life equation than the quantity of money you make.
He can't be a multimillionaire then? By definition if he was he could liquidate it all and retire if he wanted.
See my comment above. It's not that simple. Yes he could retire, but then he'd be sitting around, doing nothing. As many entrepreneurs have discovered that's not actually an appealing life. So the work that he does have to do just happens to be stressful and time consuming.
Basically, a business owner can find themselves in a theoretical situation where they have a boat load of money but are also overwhelmed with work and have no other options.
Granted, he probably will retire earlier than me, but in my scenario many of my co-workers actually choose not to retire, because they like the work.
Basically, a business owner can find themselves in a theoretical situation where they have a boat load of money but are also overwhelmed with work and have no other options.
Granted, he probably will retire earlier than me, but in my scenario many of my co-workers actually choose not to retire, because they like the work.
He doesn’t have to sit around doing nothing.
He can start a rock band. He can paint.
He can get a job at Vons to get a discount on health insurance.
The couple that founded Sierra Online woke up one day and made a new game. Being wealthy they had no economic pressure to do this.
If I woke up rich tomorrow I’d probably work on video games and open source them. Which is what I’m doing now, just after my day job.
Dream level 1: A game studio that makes quality open source games.
Level 2: An easy open source game engine.
Level 3: A programming language with 3 built in levels of abstraction. LLM level, just write what you want to the application to do and it’ll “build” the functions in real time.
Scripting level: Something like C# or Typescript.
Systems level:
Low level like Rust or C.
Mixing and matching each level in the same project is encouraged.
Dream Level 4- which would require billions upon billions of dollars to even attempt.
A completely open source OS along with open source hardware, phones, computers, tvs, etc. It scales from a 40$ Raspberry PI like device to a 10k super computer.
Your phone belongs to YOU, want to run your own code on it, cool.
I’d build the OS in the same language described in Level 3. Linux is great, but it’s also bloated from needing to run on billions of devices. If you instead say no, you make your hardware fit the OS, not the other way around much of the code could be removed.
Anyway, I think I’ll be able to retire bit early ( early 50s) and then just work on weird open source games.
Everything else in this post would require much more money than I’ll ever have.
But I declare the contents this comment CC0/MIT. Maybe a lurking billionaire will read it and do it.
Give the people back their freedom!
He can start a rock band. He can paint.
He can get a job at Vons to get a discount on health insurance.
The couple that founded Sierra Online woke up one day and made a new game. Being wealthy they had no economic pressure to do this.
If I woke up rich tomorrow I’d probably work on video games and open source them. Which is what I’m doing now, just after my day job.
Dream level 1: A game studio that makes quality open source games.
Level 2: An easy open source game engine.
Level 3: A programming language with 3 built in levels of abstraction. LLM level, just write what you want to the application to do and it’ll “build” the functions in real time.
Scripting level: Something like C# or Typescript.
Systems level:
Low level like Rust or C.
Mixing and matching each level in the same project is encouraged.
Dream Level 4- which would require billions upon billions of dollars to even attempt.
A completely open source OS along with open source hardware, phones, computers, tvs, etc. It scales from a 40$ Raspberry PI like device to a 10k super computer.
Your phone belongs to YOU, want to run your own code on it, cool.
I’d build the OS in the same language described in Level 3. Linux is great, but it’s also bloated from needing to run on billions of devices. If you instead say no, you make your hardware fit the OS, not the other way around much of the code could be removed.
Anyway, I think I’ll be able to retire bit early ( early 50s) and then just work on weird open source games.
Everything else in this post would require much more money than I’ll ever have.
But I declare the contents this comment CC0/MIT. Maybe a lurking billionaire will read it and do it.
Give the people back their freedom!
> It's not that simple.
No, it is that simple.
> Yes he could retire, but then he'd be sitting around, doing nothing
So? Is that not a valid choice?
> So the work that he does have to do just happens to be stressful and time consuming.
Imagine that he doesn't have to do this. That doing it is something that he gets to do.
Doesn't everything this person does tell us that they enjoy stress and having their time consumed by their business?
> Basically, a business owner can find themselves in a theoretical situation where they have a boat load of money but are also overwhelmed with work and have no other options.
There are always options.
No, it is that simple.
> Yes he could retire, but then he'd be sitting around, doing nothing
So? Is that not a valid choice?
> So the work that he does have to do just happens to be stressful and time consuming.
Imagine that he doesn't have to do this. That doing it is something that he gets to do.
Doesn't everything this person does tell us that they enjoy stress and having their time consumed by their business?
> Basically, a business owner can find themselves in a theoretical situation where they have a boat load of money but are also overwhelmed with work and have no other options.
There are always options.
Your rich relative has more time than you – he chooses how to spend all his time while you can only choose how to spend part of your time. He chooses to work, you have to work.
Nope, he has no choice but to work as well, but he works 7 days a week and 10 hour days to keep his businesses afloat.
If he retired.. then what? I'm also going to retire, but in the interim I experience no stress, have plenty of free time, and enjoy what I do.
If he retired.. then what? I'm also going to retire, but in the interim I experience no stress, have plenty of free time, and enjoy what I do.
If I understood you correctly, he can retire today because he already has enough money to live comfortably for the rest of his life. He does have this choice, and he chooses to continue working. Do you have the same choice? Can you retire today?
What you're not understanding is that he doesn't have the choice either. He could retire in theory, but his businesses are how he spends his time. If he retired he would have too much free time. So in practice he's in the same situation as me, he has to work. But I work much less under less stressful conditions. As I said, work life balance. He doesn't have that.
Let's see: he must work because he would have too much free time if he didn't, you must work because you would starve if you didn't. Yeah, clearly you're under less stressful conditions.
Yes, he has to work because he would have too much free time, and he still needs his businesses to survive, just as I need employment to survive. It's the same situation, but I work less hours and have a more pleasant life.
If his businesses fail he has no other options, if I lose my job I go find another one doing the same thing, making the same amount of money.
Is this really that hard to believe?
If his businesses fail he has no other options, if I lose my job I go find another one doing the same thing, making the same amount of money.
Is this really that hard to believe?
[deleted]
I’ve read all your comments here, and as someone who has at different times been both the entrepreneur making big money and the employee working a chill job, I think you’re missing the point here.
You started by making the point that he might have more money, but you have more time, which you conclude is ultimately more valuable.
As many have pointed out, he can sell his business and retire, which you don’t have the option to do. Your rejoinder that he can’t do that because then he’d have too much time makes little sense, both because you’ve already setup the axiom that “more time = more freedom”, but also because he could at that point decide to do all kinds of things: start another business, buy one, get a job, work for charity, whatever. He’s quite obviously more free than you, although perhaps not psychologically, who can say.
You don’t need to defend your life choices to anyone, but from the outside it looks like you’re making an illogical case because you can’t accept that he actually does have more freedom than you. Which is OK! There’s always someone out there doing better than us.
You started by making the point that he might have more money, but you have more time, which you conclude is ultimately more valuable.
As many have pointed out, he can sell his business and retire, which you don’t have the option to do. Your rejoinder that he can’t do that because then he’d have too much time makes little sense, both because you’ve already setup the axiom that “more time = more freedom”, but also because he could at that point decide to do all kinds of things: start another business, buy one, get a job, work for charity, whatever. He’s quite obviously more free than you, although perhaps not psychologically, who can say.
You don’t need to defend your life choices to anyone, but from the outside it looks like you’re making an illogical case because you can’t accept that he actually does have more freedom than you. Which is OK! There’s always someone out there doing better than us.
Try retiring at age 45 and see how that goes.
As I'm trying to re-iterate, work-life balance. Others in this thread are making the assumption that work is always bad. People like working, without work we have no purpose. But finding work that offers work life balance offers both - purpose and leisure time. Not an excess of one or the other,
When we have an excess of work and money we have no leisure time, when we have an excess of leisure time we have no purpose. This isn't that controversial of a point, read up on any number of uber-wealthy people that attempted to retire early.
Sure they were financially free, but in practice they were beholden to the work they chose.
As I'm trying to re-iterate, work-life balance. Others in this thread are making the assumption that work is always bad. People like working, without work we have no purpose. But finding work that offers work life balance offers both - purpose and leisure time. Not an excess of one or the other,
When we have an excess of work and money we have no leisure time, when we have an excess of leisure time we have no purpose. This isn't that controversial of a point, read up on any number of uber-wealthy people that attempted to retire early.
Sure they were financially free, but in practice they were beholden to the work they chose.
I get what you’re saying, I just think you’re justifying your position because you can’t change it. Someone who is financially independent can choose any point along the work/life balance continuum. You can’t.
And lots of people have retired early. Many struggle with it and return to work to find purpose or meaning. But they can choose to do that, and on their own terms. I’ve never heard anyone who has become financially independent wish they were back where they had to work a job in order to survive.
And guess what, if they DID want that, they could choose that too! They could donate their money and go back to work.
They’re more free than you are, no matter how you slice it. It’s OK to acknowledge that.
And lots of people have retired early. Many struggle with it and return to work to find purpose or meaning. But they can choose to do that, and on their own terms. I’ve never heard anyone who has become financially independent wish they were back where they had to work a job in order to survive.
And guess what, if they DID want that, they could choose that too! They could donate their money and go back to work.
They’re more free than you are, no matter how you slice it. It’s OK to acknowledge that.
I'll stop with this comment but I will say that there are a few fallacies in your comment. In short, you're overestimating the level of freedom many entrepreneurs actually have.
Can they choose anywhere on the work / life continuum? Maybe sometimes. Can they just go do something else? It's not always that simple.
Can they choose anywhere on the work / life continuum? Maybe sometimes. Can they just go do something else? It's not always that simple.
I’m not overestimating the freedom that entrepreneurs actually have. I didn’t make any statements about entrepreneurs in general, we’re talking specifically about your rich relative and how much freedom they have.
For the record, I am currently self-employed again after a five-year stint in big tech. Prior to that I worked for myself for more than a decade. I’ve seen this issue from both sides, and I definitely wouldn’t say most entrepreneurs can pick anywhere on the work/life balance continuum. But again, we’re not talking about most entrepreneurs, or even really about entrepreneurs at all. We’re talking about people who have reached financial independence, specifically your relative. All of this would still be true if they were an employee who had enough money to stop working tomorrow.
For the record, I am currently self-employed again after a five-year stint in big tech. Prior to that I worked for myself for more than a decade. I’ve seen this issue from both sides, and I definitely wouldn’t say most entrepreneurs can pick anywhere on the work/life balance continuum. But again, we’re not talking about most entrepreneurs, or even really about entrepreneurs at all. We’re talking about people who have reached financial independence, specifically your relative. All of this would still be true if they were an employee who had enough money to stop working tomorrow.
As someone who eventually 'got rich' (to a very comfortable FatFIRE level) after decades of high-tech startup entrepreneurship across three startups and over a dozen new products, my primary objective was never "get rich". It was to earn a good living, making cool things, in ways I found interesting, in collaboration with people I liked, for customers I liked (<--- that last part is important). While I knew making better-than-good money was always a possibility, it was never the deciding factor in choosing what to do, how to do it, who to do it with or for.
> trying to come up with multi-million dollar ideas
In my experience, starting with that mindset is unlikely to work - and worse, its focusing on the wrong thing. If you can see the multi-million dollar idea - so can other people, including competitors with more money and momentum than a new startup. I approached it differently.
The general pattern which had the best success rate for me was applying a new technology (or old tech in a new way) which I found intriguing or cool to solve a real-world problem in a new or different way that was both better and cheaper than existing solutions. One important element was validating very early on that this problem actually existed and was important (ie high-value) to real potential customers. This meant actually meeting these people and sharing a non-functioning demo or conceptual prototype able to get them interested enough to want to test prototypes as the product evolved. If your non-functioning solution demo doesn't get real potential customers almost pleading to get in the beta - then you don't yet have the right problem, solution or customer.
Developing solutions to solve real problems for real people whose names, needs and preferences we already knew made development both easier AND a lot more fun. It kept us focused and grounded in ways that were transformative. Note: I didn't say there had to be a million customers with a validated TAM of zillions of dollars. Just a handful of real customers in enough need to want to spend their limited time guiding some startup's non-existent product into existence. They're not doing it because they're nice, they're doing it because they're not happy with what they've got and want to ensure your solution arrives in a form able to solve their problem. I never spent a lot of time validating there was a huge market beyond the first pool of customers. I felt okay as long as there was plausible evidence of some reasonably sizable number of customers beyond our handful of "new best friend" customers. Doing it this way ensured we'd make some number of early adopters delighted as well as there being a high probability of at least enough early customers for a two-pizza-sized company to survive for a while.
While this was no guarantee of eventual riches, it did help ensure we were making something of real immediate value for at least some real customers who'd pay for our solution - and that alone put us past about >80% of the early issues that kill startups. The "riches" possibility is innate because once you're successfully applying an interesting new technology in new ways to solve a real problem that at least some real customers will pay real money for - there's probably at least a 10% - 20% chance you're one pivot (or less) away from an emerging new market you can be on (or close) to the ground floor of. So - once you're nearing first delivery to your "new best friend" customers, start keeping your eyes peeled for that emerging opportunity that's somewhere nearby in the same or an adjacent market. If it's not there, you've still got a lifestyle-sized business that's either breaking even or close to it, and that alone provides options. You can decide there's potential and work toward turning that break even into profit and growth or you can pivot to something adjacent with the benefit of some cash flow, real customers and the momentum of a shipping team. And that alone tends to get the attention of all the VCs who previously wouldn't return your calls.
> I hate the business side... actually figuring out how to make money... That's the hard part.
I doubt you'll be able to make it as a tech startup entrepreneur until you re-frame that. I used to jokingly say "If you solve a present and painful problem for your customers, it's hard to get them to stop throwing money at you." While an exaggeration, there's serious truth there. As for making money, until you find engineering a business model that actually works just as fascinating as engineering any other machine into actually fucking working - you'll suck at doing it and keep hating it. If you don't see a 'business model' as just another interesting, tangible and tractable engineering problem to be instrumented, debugged and solved - you'll probably have a better time working for other people.
> I like building stuff with my friends
Okay, when you guys are done playing with yourselves, maybe try playing with someone else... or, even better, for someone else. Like real customers. Helping nice people in real need is way more interesting, challenging and emotionally rewarding than playing with yourselves. And having an audience who's invested in the quality of your performance is a wonderful way stay grounded in what matters. I got into this as a 20 year-old introvert who liked nerding around with computers, but on the journey I ended up meeting nice people with interesting problems and discovered I kind of liked using my nerd powers to 'save them' from the shitty, costly or annoying problem making part of their day miserable. Give it a try. Frankly, if solving interesting problems in cool ways for nice people doesn't light up some chunk of neurons in your skull, then maybe entrepreneurship isn't for you.
Bottom line, the way I eventually managed to "get rich" was by not trying to get rich. Instead, I changed my definition of success to: having fun with my friends solving real problems in technically interesting ways for real customers we liked. I emotionally came to peace with the reality that, if all I managed to do was solve problems for enough people to pay our rent and bills with a few bucks left over - that alone was enough. Not only enough to be worth doing but enough to be morally and ethically "Good". Sure, more financial upside would be nice if it happened but, the reality is, some of that will always be out of our control. Your post sounds like you're basically giving up on playing the tech startup game. Before you do, at least consider there may be ways to redefine the game so that it matters to more people than you and your friends, so that money is not the only metric and so that "winning" is mostly within your control.
> trying to come up with multi-million dollar ideas
In my experience, starting with that mindset is unlikely to work - and worse, its focusing on the wrong thing. If you can see the multi-million dollar idea - so can other people, including competitors with more money and momentum than a new startup. I approached it differently.
The general pattern which had the best success rate for me was applying a new technology (or old tech in a new way) which I found intriguing or cool to solve a real-world problem in a new or different way that was both better and cheaper than existing solutions. One important element was validating very early on that this problem actually existed and was important (ie high-value) to real potential customers. This meant actually meeting these people and sharing a non-functioning demo or conceptual prototype able to get them interested enough to want to test prototypes as the product evolved. If your non-functioning solution demo doesn't get real potential customers almost pleading to get in the beta - then you don't yet have the right problem, solution or customer.
Developing solutions to solve real problems for real people whose names, needs and preferences we already knew made development both easier AND a lot more fun. It kept us focused and grounded in ways that were transformative. Note: I didn't say there had to be a million customers with a validated TAM of zillions of dollars. Just a handful of real customers in enough need to want to spend their limited time guiding some startup's non-existent product into existence. They're not doing it because they're nice, they're doing it because they're not happy with what they've got and want to ensure your solution arrives in a form able to solve their problem. I never spent a lot of time validating there was a huge market beyond the first pool of customers. I felt okay as long as there was plausible evidence of some reasonably sizable number of customers beyond our handful of "new best friend" customers. Doing it this way ensured we'd make some number of early adopters delighted as well as there being a high probability of at least enough early customers for a two-pizza-sized company to survive for a while.
While this was no guarantee of eventual riches, it did help ensure we were making something of real immediate value for at least some real customers who'd pay for our solution - and that alone put us past about >80% of the early issues that kill startups. The "riches" possibility is innate because once you're successfully applying an interesting new technology in new ways to solve a real problem that at least some real customers will pay real money for - there's probably at least a 10% - 20% chance you're one pivot (or less) away from an emerging new market you can be on (or close) to the ground floor of. So - once you're nearing first delivery to your "new best friend" customers, start keeping your eyes peeled for that emerging opportunity that's somewhere nearby in the same or an adjacent market. If it's not there, you've still got a lifestyle-sized business that's either breaking even or close to it, and that alone provides options. You can decide there's potential and work toward turning that break even into profit and growth or you can pivot to something adjacent with the benefit of some cash flow, real customers and the momentum of a shipping team. And that alone tends to get the attention of all the VCs who previously wouldn't return your calls.
> I hate the business side... actually figuring out how to make money... That's the hard part.
I doubt you'll be able to make it as a tech startup entrepreneur until you re-frame that. I used to jokingly say "If you solve a present and painful problem for your customers, it's hard to get them to stop throwing money at you." While an exaggeration, there's serious truth there. As for making money, until you find engineering a business model that actually works just as fascinating as engineering any other machine into actually fucking working - you'll suck at doing it and keep hating it. If you don't see a 'business model' as just another interesting, tangible and tractable engineering problem to be instrumented, debugged and solved - you'll probably have a better time working for other people.
> I like building stuff with my friends
Okay, when you guys are done playing with yourselves, maybe try playing with someone else... or, even better, for someone else. Like real customers. Helping nice people in real need is way more interesting, challenging and emotionally rewarding than playing with yourselves. And having an audience who's invested in the quality of your performance is a wonderful way stay grounded in what matters. I got into this as a 20 year-old introvert who liked nerding around with computers, but on the journey I ended up meeting nice people with interesting problems and discovered I kind of liked using my nerd powers to 'save them' from the shitty, costly or annoying problem making part of their day miserable. Give it a try. Frankly, if solving interesting problems in cool ways for nice people doesn't light up some chunk of neurons in your skull, then maybe entrepreneurship isn't for you.
Bottom line, the way I eventually managed to "get rich" was by not trying to get rich. Instead, I changed my definition of success to: having fun with my friends solving real problems in technically interesting ways for real customers we liked. I emotionally came to peace with the reality that, if all I managed to do was solve problems for enough people to pay our rent and bills with a few bucks left over - that alone was enough. Not only enough to be worth doing but enough to be morally and ethically "Good". Sure, more financial upside would be nice if it happened but, the reality is, some of that will always be out of our control. Your post sounds like you're basically giving up on playing the tech startup game. Before you do, at least consider there may be ways to redefine the game so that it matters to more people than you and your friends, so that money is not the only metric and so that "winning" is mostly within your control.
>Your post sounds like you're basically giving up on playing the tech startup game. Before you do, at least consider there may be ways to redefine the game so that it matters to more people than you and your friends, so that money is not the only metric and so that "winning" is mostly within your control.
Correct. I'm still open to working for startups, but as far as coming up with my own ideas, I've accepted it's probably not going to happen.
I still plan on making some side projects, working on an open source game now, and I've written a script ( probably going to switch it to a short graphical novel I can self fund).
I definitely will revisit your comment in the future, I think you've just provided a full semester of Business School in a few paragraphs. What I take from this is I need to find the tools that people want, and actually build those instead of building tools and then telling people how amazing and great they are.
I think the next big B2B opportunity would be something like Pivotal Tracker / Jira , but with intelligent LLM generated summaries of what each team member is working on. As well as the option to assign small scale tickets to code agents which would either write the code or at a minimum create a branch with the methods stubbed out.
I don't really think I have the capital to do this personally. But hypothetically if I did, I'd build a POC and then offer it to members of my game dev group.
Or maybe I should just go down to this one bar where I know a lot of old school business folks hang out. These are men and women with relatively high net worths, and just ask straight up what problems they'd liked solved.
Do you have any suggestions for books on your business philosophy ? I might have free time in a few months.
Correct. I'm still open to working for startups, but as far as coming up with my own ideas, I've accepted it's probably not going to happen.
I still plan on making some side projects, working on an open source game now, and I've written a script ( probably going to switch it to a short graphical novel I can self fund).
I definitely will revisit your comment in the future, I think you've just provided a full semester of Business School in a few paragraphs. What I take from this is I need to find the tools that people want, and actually build those instead of building tools and then telling people how amazing and great they are.
I think the next big B2B opportunity would be something like Pivotal Tracker / Jira , but with intelligent LLM generated summaries of what each team member is working on. As well as the option to assign small scale tickets to code agents which would either write the code or at a minimum create a branch with the methods stubbed out.
I don't really think I have the capital to do this personally. But hypothetically if I did, I'd build a POC and then offer it to members of my game dev group.
Or maybe I should just go down to this one bar where I know a lot of old school business folks hang out. These are men and women with relatively high net worths, and just ask straight up what problems they'd liked solved.
Do you have any suggestions for books on your business philosophy ? I might have free time in a few months.
> What I take from this is I need to find the tools that people want
Yep.
> Do you have any suggestions for books
Lean Startup by Eric Ries
Business Model Generation by Alex Osterwalder
Yep.
> Do you have any suggestions for books
Lean Startup by Eric Ries
Business Model Generation by Alex Osterwalder
I'm doing much better than I could of ever hopped to when I was growing up.
However, in my mid 30s, something is different. I went from trying to come up with multi-million dollar ideas and cold calling( tweeting/emailing) VCs asking for funding and feedback. Now I'm just content working on small games.
I have another project which is basically a music/lyric video generator in Unity.
I really like the technical aspects of creating a startup, picking a stack and hacking something together. I hate the business side. Idea guys with half-baked ideas who expect free prototypes. I like building stuff with my friends, but actually figuring out how to make money... That's the hard part.