Plex Security Incident(links.plex.tv)
links.plex.tv
Plex Security Incident
https://links.plex.tv/s/vb/Vn7XtnwDSSaqqDUYoHu1P57ZgZ1FsHgTO2PTIBl6jEOUiHBH3LGmI3nLdDfopQa54PatUwZQhT0Bz8rKAi--jTM4ATdsBHpe4c1Yljr89VkoCOavEGH5wn5Fi_filLNeOMo-lnNqLSLpJpI/lOe98S8UWKdmPnp9StQz9R1-kOSTpWhr/12
93 comments
I'll fill in what I can -
>- how easy is it to administer for clients outside of my network or possibly even outside my country?
Jellyfin is just the software, not a hosted solution. I use a simple server/seedbox, with sane configs (good providers have automated this), which results in a secure public-facing admin console with a username/password. They have basic user management features to include other users in your server.
> - how good is the app support? I transcode all of my media to AAC and h264 for compatibility
Jellyfin has a broad ecosystem of apps on a bunch of platforms, each with their pros and cons. I recommend poking around. When figuring my setup out, I downloaded 3 or 4 different Android apps to pick the one I liked (support for multiple servers which isn't a given in all the apps)
> -what about for streaming music? I really like Plex amp IMO Plex has always been substandard here since they hoisted the music interface into the same one they use for everything else, so it's really lacking in filters/administration features I depend on. That said Jellyfin supports music and has the same simple feature set.
> - what do you like the most about jellyfin
It's free and untethered to a company's whims. It also does a lot less of the social/DVR stuff that I have no interest in.
>- what do you miss most about Plex?
Their app experience was a bit more premium, and their support for multiple servers is better than Jellyfin since they own the servers/hosting to do it. I also really used to enjoy the 'remote' functionality where I could skip episodes by clicking next on the Plex app in my phone. This hasn't worked for a few years for me despite heavy troubleshooting.
>- how easy is it to administer for clients outside of my network or possibly even outside my country?
Jellyfin is just the software, not a hosted solution. I use a simple server/seedbox, with sane configs (good providers have automated this), which results in a secure public-facing admin console with a username/password. They have basic user management features to include other users in your server.
> - how good is the app support? I transcode all of my media to AAC and h264 for compatibility
Jellyfin has a broad ecosystem of apps on a bunch of platforms, each with their pros and cons. I recommend poking around. When figuring my setup out, I downloaded 3 or 4 different Android apps to pick the one I liked (support for multiple servers which isn't a given in all the apps)
> -what about for streaming music? I really like Plex amp IMO Plex has always been substandard here since they hoisted the music interface into the same one they use for everything else, so it's really lacking in filters/administration features I depend on. That said Jellyfin supports music and has the same simple feature set.
> - what do you like the most about jellyfin
It's free and untethered to a company's whims. It also does a lot less of the social/DVR stuff that I have no interest in.
>- what do you miss most about Plex?
Their app experience was a bit more premium, and their support for multiple servers is better than Jellyfin since they own the servers/hosting to do it. I also really used to enjoy the 'remote' functionality where I could skip episodes by clicking next on the Plex app in my phone. This hasn't worked for a few years for me despite heavy troubleshooting.
The official jellyfin android app also provides 'remote' functionality (skip episodes, browse library, change volume etc.). It works well for me most of the time, but occasionally it can't find the remote session until I restart the jellyfin instance.
> how easy is it to administer for clients outside of my network or possibly even outside my country?
You can run Jellyfin in any docker container. If you want to run it on a NAS in your home office and put it on the internet through ngrok or tailscale, you totally can. But you can host it pretty much wherever.
> how good is the app support? I transcode all of my media to AAC and h264 for compatibility
The official clients are just ok. They'll support all the file types you'd expect, but they're fairly slow and not great at streaming 4K. I pay for a client (Infuse Pro) that addresses a lot of those pain points, but it's been relatively poor at auto-detecting tv show metadata, so I'm still in the market for an app I'm happy with. Ideally an open source one.
> - what about for streaming music?
Technically works, but whether it's a good experience depends on the client you're using.
> - what do you like the most about jellyfin
Easy to set up. Great plugins for finding subtitles/artwork/metadata. Open source with good docs. Works with lots of clients. Easy to create and share accounts, and has fun features like synced remote viewing parties.
- what do you miss most about Plex?
The ads. jk never used it.
You can run Jellyfin in any docker container. If you want to run it on a NAS in your home office and put it on the internet through ngrok or tailscale, you totally can. But you can host it pretty much wherever.
> how good is the app support? I transcode all of my media to AAC and h264 for compatibility
The official clients are just ok. They'll support all the file types you'd expect, but they're fairly slow and not great at streaming 4K. I pay for a client (Infuse Pro) that addresses a lot of those pain points, but it's been relatively poor at auto-detecting tv show metadata, so I'm still in the market for an app I'm happy with. Ideally an open source one.
> - what about for streaming music?
Technically works, but whether it's a good experience depends on the client you're using.
> - what do you like the most about jellyfin
Easy to set up. Great plugins for finding subtitles/artwork/metadata. Open source with good docs. Works with lots of clients. Easy to create and share accounts, and has fun features like synced remote viewing parties.
- what do you miss most about Plex?
The ads. jk never used it.
Not sure about jellyfin, but I really dig Emby. Just as convenient as Plex. I can't even remember why I switched to Emby over Plex, but I never looked back.
I've been a paid user of Emby for years and it's been well worth it.
I think the final straw was Plex artificially blocking transcoding on Raspberry PI, even though it would work with a ton of work arounds.
I think the final straw was Plex artificially blocking transcoding on Raspberry PI, even though it would work with a ton of work arounds.
Emby performs better than Jellyfin IME, at least if you need it to work on older TVs. Though IDK if they still offer a lifetime (pay once) subscription.
> what do you like the most about jellyfin
- Not selling off my watching history to third parties. This is a privacy disaster still about to blow up. Expect holders of large plex libraries with pirated content to be lined up in court in the near future.
- Decentralized.
- Not parasiting on FOSS such as ffmpeg. Plex famously took everything from ffmpeg and gave nothing back, while making lots of money in the process.
- Not selling off my watching history to third parties. This is a privacy disaster still about to blow up. Expect holders of large plex libraries with pirated content to be lined up in court in the near future.
- Decentralized.
- Not parasiting on FOSS such as ffmpeg. Plex famously took everything from ffmpeg and gave nothing back, while making lots of money in the process.
I ran plex for years but gave up once they started tracking all activity.
Jellyfin is way to administer. Clients are rough and often crash. Influx is often the best choice for IOS but has its own... weird decisions on how to handle libraries.
The main thing I miss is being able to download transcoded media for mobile devices so I can watch on a plane.
Jellyfin is way to administer. Clients are rough and often crash. Influx is often the best choice for IOS but has its own... weird decisions on how to handle libraries.
The main thing I miss is being able to download transcoded media for mobile devices so I can watch on a plane.
Plex mysteriously began refusing remote connections, so I couldn't share with my friend outside my home LAN. Manually port forwarding didn't solve anything, and my firewall isn't the problem. That's as far as Plex help goes...
I went to Jellyfin (plus Tailscale VPN). Some things are really nice, but others... well, it's an open-source project, and people only fix what they see as broken. So, I've tried restarting, only to lose every single customization I did. It's not worth my time to fill out their tickets and play that lottery, so I just accept the UI issues.
Then, mysteriously, Jellyfin also quit broadcasting remotely. A month later, its server wasn't even visible on my own LAN to my TV.
So I uninstalled BOTH Plex and Jellyfin, and reinstalled both. Jellyfin still doesn't connect right. And Plex works... until suddenly it doesn't, and I have to cycle through Off/On with "Allow remote connections", until it works again, mysteriously.
PRO'S OF EACH:
Plex: Much better support in TV libraries. No need for a VPN. Simpler UI.
Jellyfin: Ability to create Collections, which are basically filter-defined libraries. Without rearranging any files, you can build a Collection of Star Wars movies, or all movies directed by Scorsese, or any arbitrary bunch of media files at all, really. Optionally, you can reduce your library clutter with these Collections: a library named Science Fiction can have all of your Star Wars movies listed as a single item (that Collection). Basically, sub-libraries, but they aren't restricted to one library's contents (Star Wars might contain a documentary on "The Making Of" that isn't actually stored in Science Fiction).
I went to Jellyfin (plus Tailscale VPN). Some things are really nice, but others... well, it's an open-source project, and people only fix what they see as broken. So, I've tried restarting, only to lose every single customization I did. It's not worth my time to fill out their tickets and play that lottery, so I just accept the UI issues.
Then, mysteriously, Jellyfin also quit broadcasting remotely. A month later, its server wasn't even visible on my own LAN to my TV.
So I uninstalled BOTH Plex and Jellyfin, and reinstalled both. Jellyfin still doesn't connect right. And Plex works... until suddenly it doesn't, and I have to cycle through Off/On with "Allow remote connections", until it works again, mysteriously.
PRO'S OF EACH:
Plex: Much better support in TV libraries. No need for a VPN. Simpler UI.
Jellyfin: Ability to create Collections, which are basically filter-defined libraries. Without rearranging any files, you can build a Collection of Star Wars movies, or all movies directed by Scorsese, or any arbitrary bunch of media files at all, really. Optionally, you can reduce your library clutter with these Collections: a library named Science Fiction can have all of your Star Wars movies listed as a single item (that Collection). Basically, sub-libraries, but they aren't restricted to one library's contents (Star Wars might contain a documentary on "The Making Of" that isn't actually stored in Science Fiction).
> Plex mysteriously began refusing remote connections, so I couldn't share with my friend outside my home LAN.
Same issue for me. The client app used to have a "remote servers" configuration option. You had to manually set up port forwarding and get the configuration perfect, which I suspect was beyond your average Joe. But once you did it was rock solid.
They now have some automagic arrangement based on uPnP which anybody can use, when it works. But it doesn't always work and because they've removed the old manual option when it doesn't work, there is no remote access for you. You would hope they would add some debugging and doco to give you some visibility into what it depends on so you can isolate the problem, but no, they provide nothing.
Same issue for me. The client app used to have a "remote servers" configuration option. You had to manually set up port forwarding and get the configuration perfect, which I suspect was beyond your average Joe. But once you did it was rock solid.
They now have some automagic arrangement based on uPnP which anybody can use, when it works. But it doesn't always work and because they've removed the old manual option when it doesn't work, there is no remote access for you. You would hope they would add some debugging and doco to give you some visibility into what it depends on so you can isolate the problem, but no, they provide nothing.
- just like any web service, reverse proxy with SSL, it has internal user management
- there are a variety of apps to choose from on ios/android, smart TVs might be limited or nonexistent (LG has a good one though)
- consider a separate dedicated tool for music, like Navidrome
- it's open source, its developers respect me and my users and do not abuse their access to them using dark patterns to extract revenue
- features that they have removed anyway (plugins, photo sync, plex cloud)
- there are a variety of apps to choose from on ios/android, smart TVs might be limited or nonexistent (LG has a good one though)
- consider a separate dedicated tool for music, like Navidrome
- it's open source, its developers respect me and my users and do not abuse their access to them using dark patterns to extract revenue
- features that they have removed anyway (plugins, photo sync, plex cloud)
> what do you like the most about jellyfin
I own the instance that's running on my own homeserver. It does what I want it to do. Stream my media for me, other directly in the same network, or transcodes when I'm away.
I own the instance that's running on my own homeserver. It does what I want it to do. Stream my media for me, other directly in the same network, or transcodes when I'm away.
I don't understand. I run a Plex instance on my home server as well. Are you referring to jellyfin not needing a centralized Plex account? Or do most Plex users rely on a plex-provided server?
Plex works on chromecast etc, not for jellyfin
Huh? I’ve used jellyfin on my chromecast for years
Always disliked Plex for them imposing themselves as a middleman to using the software locally, which is ultimately the root cause for this incident.
> An unauthorized third party accessed a limited subset of customer data from one of our databases
How could only a subset be affected? Any architecture other than a "users" db table wouldn't make sense.
How could only a subset be affected? Any architecture other than a "users" db table wouldn't make sense.
I have no idea how Plex runs their servers, but I've worked at companies where new systems are rolled out for new users/accounts, but old users/accounts are left on the "legacy" system (usually with the plan to migrate once the new system has been deployed and there is bandwidth available to handle the complexity of migrating users between systems). In particular, if you have a long-running service where some very old accounts might have special billing/pricing logic that you want to continue honoring but is difficult to implement in the new system, such a setup might make sense to continue long-term for a small subset of accounts.
Alternatively, maybe they mean that the limited subset of data was specifically the "email" and "password_hash" columns of the database ;P
Alternatively, maybe they mean that the limited subset of data was specifically the "email" and "password_hash" columns of the database ;P
Could be technically true in that they didn’t access every last bit of “user data” like support chat logs or whatever stored elsewhere, but they have phrased it that way to make it seem like less of a big deal. Just a guess.
Sharding the data across DB's, separate credentials for each DB.
It's easy to imagine Plex has some db sharding going on at their scale, or that they host in multiple geographic regions for regional compliance, or on multiple cloud providers.
Rows 1-200,000 instead of 1-1,000,000 I would presume.
Related:
Plex Update: Notice of a potential security incident - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45174684
Plex Update: Notice of a potential security incident - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45174684
> Any account passwords that may have been accessed were securely hashed, in accordance with best practices, meaning they cannot be read by a third party.
I am glad they were hashed, but that's a misleading statement. The point of hashing is to slow an attacker down, even with full best security practices (e.g. salt + pepper + argon2 w/high factors) they can still be reverse engineered. It is a matter of when, not if.
I am glad they were hashed, but that's a misleading statement. The point of hashing is to slow an attacker down, even with full best security practices (e.g. salt + pepper + argon2 w/high factors) they can still be reverse engineered. It is a matter of when, not if.
This is misleading, if the password is a certain length, then it might as well be considered secure. You could safely release hashes.
I'll pay you $10k if you can crack this sha512 hash.
I'd offer a million, but I don't have that kind of money.
5a55b7b0e1f9452f925b1aa43cf148081da58c66c735961d9a7cb699b2fd5b08bee6b24ec47fce0b93ba49df83641a30c7843dece49e0a0db5a7c50901492fdd
It's technically true that all cryptography is just slowing things down, but we are talking about heat death of the universe lengths of time for most crypto algorithms.
*assuming quantum computing doesn't take off or a fundamental flaw isn't found in the crypto.
I'll pay you $10k if you can crack this sha512 hash.
I'd offer a million, but I don't have that kind of money.
5a55b7b0e1f9452f925b1aa43cf148081da58c66c735961d9a7cb699b2fd5b08bee6b24ec47fce0b93ba49df83641a30c7843dece49e0a0db5a7c50901492fdd
It's technically true that all cryptography is just slowing things down, but we are talking about heat death of the universe lengths of time for most crypto algorithms.
*assuming quantum computing doesn't take off or a fundamental flaw isn't found in the crypto.
The weakpoint is, has, and will always be people. They're cryptographic hashes of people's chosen passwords. You aren't attacking hypothetical mathematical entropy, you're attacking human imagination and laziness.
It isn't academic either. I have broken tons of cryptographic hashes in my career. Most of my colleagues have too. From DES through bcrypt over tens of years. The cost/performance has slowed, but the techniques haven't changed one bit because PEOPLE haven't changed one bit.
Obviously nobody can crack a sha512 hash likely containing a randomly generated cryptographic number. But that's irrelevant, because we're discussing the Plex security incident where humans created passwords, and humans today, tomorrow, and ten years ago are just as incapable of creating good passwords.
So their claim that these hashes "cannot be read" is inaccurate. If you have a modest budget and want to target a handful of accounts, there are multiple CHEAP cloud services that will happily sell you compute to do so.
It isn't academic either. I have broken tons of cryptographic hashes in my career. Most of my colleagues have too. From DES through bcrypt over tens of years. The cost/performance has slowed, but the techniques haven't changed one bit because PEOPLE haven't changed one bit.
Obviously nobody can crack a sha512 hash likely containing a randomly generated cryptographic number. But that's irrelevant, because we're discussing the Plex security incident where humans created passwords, and humans today, tomorrow, and ten years ago are just as incapable of creating good passwords.
So their claim that these hashes "cannot be read" is inaccurate. If you have a modest budget and want to target a handful of accounts, there are multiple CHEAP cloud services that will happily sell you compute to do so.
sha* is a horrible choice for storing passwords. It's intended use is for verifying data integrity.
You should be using the solutions readily available instead of trying to reinventing the wheel, or avoid this subject altogether if you can't be bothered to educate yourself as to why.
This has been a decades-long issue, and it blows my mind how people in IT still didn't get the memo.
Use argon2, scrypt or even bcrypt who all are designed for keeping passwords secure with regards to brute force cracking.
You should be using the solutions readily available instead of trying to reinventing the wheel, or avoid this subject altogether if you can't be bothered to educate yourself as to why.
This has been a decades-long issue, and it blows my mind how people in IT still didn't get the memo.
Use argon2, scrypt or even bcrypt who all are designed for keeping passwords secure with regards to brute force cracking.
I agree, but the entropy of the string that produced that hash will nullify any such disadvantage.
One of the aspects of MtGox's database leak that I found most fascinating to watch was the public effort to figure out users' passwords from the hashes. Checking common passwords, patterns, and people's public interests on Twitter was all shockingly effective.
This sounds fascinating. Has there been any literature produced on this specific incident and unfolding attempts?
Technically you may have to burn more entropy than exists in the visible universe, so its a possible if in the case of the right hash and luck.
> (e.g. salt + pepper + argon2 w/high factors) they can still be reverse engineered. It is a matter of when, not if
How much compute/gpu and hard dollars would hackers need in order to reverse engineers those stollen passwords?
How much compute/gpu and hard dollars would hackers need in order to reverse engineers those stollen passwords?
They borrow unsecured k8s clusters on AWS. That’s not redis running…
Approximately “infinite”.
Maybe this is naive, but in a good crypto system, I would hope "when" is measured in millions or billions of years given current hardware capabilities.
If you have a long enough and random enough password, you're probably good. The trouble with short passwords is that there just aren't that many of them. An attacker can just compute the hash of all of them.
As long as the salt is secret from the attackers (which is not a given, of course), the length of the passwords shouldn't matter all too much; the input to the hash (i.e. password + hash) would still have enough entropy to not be brute-force-able.
If you have the hashed password, in most systems you have the salt. Salt+hash is for preventing the attackers from getting to try all your passwords in parallel.
Maybe this is what you're saying, I'm not sure - my understanding was that the salt prevents reused passwords from resulting in the same hash. So, if I use 'password' and you use 'password' the salt+hash will be different. That way attackers can't just hash all the common passwords once and immediately associate them with different accounts.
Yeah, exactly. Commonly, the salts are stored right next to the hashes in the DB, because they serve their purpose even if the attacker knows what the salts are. By using a different salt for every password, the attacker needs execute a full "guess, hash, compare, repeat" attack on each user, as opposed to "guess, hash, compare against all user passwords, repeat" on the entire database.
You can also have a system salt(s) that are not stored with the database, so that if someone accesses the database they have to guess password and two salts, one of which they hopefully do not have via the same penetration.
[deleted]
For all practical purposes what you're saying is just wrong.
I've done so within the last year, successfully. Cost $7 for a single password in just compute and took about 17 hours (lowest, cheapest priority).
So please explain your reply further. Also recall their claim for context of what I was replying to, and what you're here defending now.
If their claim is credible what I did and what you're reiterating wasn't possible.
So please explain your reply further. Also recall their claim for context of what I was replying to, and what you're here defending now.
If their claim is credible what I did and what you're reiterating wasn't possible.
You brute forced a random argon2 hashed password using cheap compute in 17 hours?
Granted the suggested defaults for argon2 is like ~0.1 second per verification on a rather beefy CPU, in 17h that's about 620 000 guesses.
Your cheap compute would likely perform worse.
That is beyond improbable. You are making it up.
Granted the suggested defaults for argon2 is like ~0.1 second per verification on a rather beefy CPU, in 17h that's about 620 000 guesses.
Your cheap compute would likely perform worse.
That is beyond improbable. You are making it up.
Your story lacks important context. Was the password "password"? "123456"? Or a 12-character mix of cases, numbers, and special characters?
No you haven't, not for a reasonably strong password.
They had this same thing happen in 2022, too. "a third-party was able to access a limited subset of data that includes emails, usernames, and encrypted passwords"
This is the exact reason you shouldn't use a "self-hosted" service that insists on phoning home before you can access media on your own damn server.
Edit: disregard. Just received the email.
What’s the date of this release? There was a similar release a few months ago and I’m curious if I need to again reset my account.
What’s the date of this release? There was a similar release a few months ago and I’m curious if I need to again reset my account.
I switched to Emby already. Much better experience imo. External player support is great.
Not necessarily related, but I'll take the opportunity to share my dislike of this company. Like others, they built a loyal following around a set of features provided, no questions asked, to stream your content to your own devices.
Over the last couple of years, Plex has continued to strip functionality, add paywalls, make deals with publishing companies, and take other actions that firmly put them in the 'enshittifaction' phase. They've capitalized on the community that gave them their success, so I've cashed out as well.
At this point there is little need for those of us with some technical ability to use this software and all the bloat that comes with it. Jellyfin[1] is an excellent alternative that I've fully switched over to this last year. I will not let a company take ownership of my media library, ever.
[1] https://jellyfin.org/
Over the last couple of years, Plex has continued to strip functionality, add paywalls, make deals with publishing companies, and take other actions that firmly put them in the 'enshittifaction' phase. They've capitalized on the community that gave them their success, so I've cashed out as well.
At this point there is little need for those of us with some technical ability to use this software and all the bloat that comes with it. Jellyfin[1] is an excellent alternative that I've fully switched over to this last year. I will not let a company take ownership of my media library, ever.
[1] https://jellyfin.org/
I have a “lifetime pass”. I’ve noticed some of these “features” creeping into the ecosystem (bloat), but I haven’t actually seen any stripped functionality. For the most part, it works as advertised.
That being said, a lot of my mates are moving to Jellyfin. Nothing but good things from them.
That being said, a lot of my mates are moving to Jellyfin. Nothing but good things from them.
> but I haven’t actually seen any stripped functionality
Plugins, the watch later list, the up next/playback queue, Plex Cloud/Cloud Sync, photo backup (this one hurt), privacy preferences were badly nerfed.
Those are just the ones I miss, I'm sure there are more (like the short lived arcade thing).
Plugins, the watch later list, the up next/playback queue, Plex Cloud/Cloud Sync, photo backup (this one hurt), privacy preferences were badly nerfed.
Those are just the ones I miss, I'm sure there are more (like the short lived arcade thing).
Watch Together is also being removed
Which got a lot of people (including me, also a lifetime subscriber) in this thread absolutely livid: https://forums.plex.tv/t/allow-watch-together-for-tv-shows-m...
(We were begging for them to fix the functionality of watch together for almost 5 years)
(We were begging for them to fix the functionality of watch together for almost 5 years)
For lifetime pass owners, I think you've dodged the features they've put paywalls up for. The big one is preventing free accounts from streaming to shared user libraries. So if you have your pass + 5 buddies sharing their plexes (and they don't have Plus), you cannot view their content I believe.
You first post said "built a loyal following around a set of features provided, no questions asked, to stream your content to your own devices" and now you're saying they removed the ability for people to share content with each other if they are not paying customers.
I like Jellyfin, but I keep using Plex for two reasons.
First is subtitle support is quite limited in comparison. It fails more often than it works for me.
Second is the lack of skipping.
This is with the Android TV client, haven't really tried the others.
First is subtitle support is quite limited in comparison. It fails more often than it works for me.
Second is the lack of skipping.
This is with the Android TV client, haven't really tried the others.
Jellyfin clients are the weakest aspect imo. Sort of hit or miss, and the ios client is inferior to a 3rd party paid offering (infuse)
> First is subtitle support is quite limited in comparison.
I always watch with subtitles, but haven't noticed worse support in jellyfin vs plex, really. Granted, I mostly use srt/ssa (text based subtitles).
> Second is the lack of skipping.
You just need to install the intro skipper plugin :)
https://github.com/intro-skipper/intro-skipper
I always watch with subtitles, but haven't noticed worse support in jellyfin vs plex, really. Granted, I mostly use srt/ssa (text based subtitles).
> Second is the lack of skipping.
You just need to install the intro skipper plugin :)
https://github.com/intro-skipper/intro-skipper
Hm, I too primarily have srt's. No idea why just says "failed to load" or somesuch and I haven't been arsed to figure out why when I can just hop over to Plex and watch.
That said, I've had a few HDR movies which Jellyfin handled a lot better, so it's a bit here and there.
As for skipping, I primarily skip backwards when I miss dialog (so much mumbling these days), or forward when it's a TV show which has segments I don't care too much about, like say some irrelevant love subplot.
That said, I've had a few HDR movies which Jellyfin handled a lot better, so it's a bit here and there.
As for skipping, I primarily skip backwards when I miss dialog (so much mumbling these days), or forward when it's a TV show which has segments I don't care too much about, like say some irrelevant love subplot.
Fair, I handle subtitles in my ingestion pipeline and so those are ready to go by the time Jellyfin gets involved.
Skipping, do you mean skipping intros and such? Or something else?
Skipping, do you mean skipping intros and such? Or something else?
> I handle subtitles in my ingestion pipeline
What do you do? Separate file? Not sure if I've noticed a pattern other than "mostly doesn't work well".
> Skipping, do you mean skipping intros and such?
Sorry, I meant jumping back and forth. On Plex I can just press left/right arrows on the remote, and it jumps a few seconds. On Jellyfin I have to press ok/confirm to actually do the jump. Very annoying.
What do you do? Separate file? Not sure if I've noticed a pattern other than "mostly doesn't work well".
> Skipping, do you mean skipping intros and such?
Sorry, I meant jumping back and forth. On Plex I can just press left/right arrows on the remote, and it jumps a few seconds. On Jellyfin I have to press ok/confirm to actually do the jump. Very annoying.
The *arr stack is what people usually use.
Bazarr specifically in this case, it can search multiple locations for missing subtitles automatically.
Bazarr specifically in this case, it can search multiple locations for missing subtitles automatically.
Some Plex clients will fail to direct stream DTS + PGS.
Jellyfin somehow just works on all my devices.
Jellyfin somehow just works on all my devices.
One thing I'll note is that while I've found every device surface I've come across has a Plex app, that isn't true of Jellyfin. YMMV.
They removed mobile device playback rights from users who paid for this feature specifically. Nobody in their right mind will do business with Plex.
Do I still need to mess with filenames in order to have jellyfin pick them up to create the library?
Not if:
* they already have peer filename.nfo files with TVDB | IMDB | TMDB ID's
* not if they have scene standard names AND are not ambiguous media names (eg: Utopia - which of the 5 possible series do you mean?)
But these are issues all media libraries face.
Group series episodes in per series (or even per season) folders and include a tvshow.nfo file with any IDs.
eg:
which just leaves the issue of TheMovieDB being weak on metadata for that series .. but can be completed from theTVDB https://www.thetvdb.com/series/media-watch
* they already have peer filename.nfo files with TVDB | IMDB | TMDB ID's
* not if they have scene standard names AND are not ambiguous media names (eg: Utopia - which of the 5 possible series do you mean?)
But these are issues all media libraries face.
Group series episodes in per series (or even per season) folders and include a tvshow.nfo file with any IDs.
eg:
<episodeguide>{"tmdb":"328","imdb":"tt0983200","tvdb":"82616","tvrage":"7565","wikidata":"Q6805564"}</episodeguide>
<id>82616</id>
<imdbid>tt0983200</imdbid>
<tmdbid>328</tmdbid>
<uniqueid default="false" type="tmdb">328</uniqueid>
<uniqueid default="false" type="imdb">tt0983200</uniqueid>
<uniqueid default="true" type="tvdb">82616</uniqueid>
<uniqueid default="false" type="tvrage">7565</uniqueid>
<uniqueid default="false" type="wikidata">Q6805564</uniqueid>
<premiered>1989-05-08</premiered>
which just leaves the issue of TheMovieDB being weak on metadata for that series .. but can be completed from theTVDB https://www.thetvdb.com/series/media-watch
You need to sometimes suffix the folder/file name with {imdb-tt1234} to make it match the correct movie/show.
This is the same deal with Plex tho, although I found plex internal metadata engine to auto-match better than jellyfin currently does.
You can help here though. Just come to https://www.themoviedb.org/ and help us add metadata.
This is the same deal with Plex tho, although I found plex internal metadata engine to auto-match better than jellyfin currently does.
You can help here though. Just come to https://www.themoviedb.org/ and help us add metadata.
Changing files isn't really an option for me because my media stays in an off-site server and the mount point is readonly.
I'll setup jellyfin and see which titles I'm unable to add and try to collaborate on metadata. It's always important to favor opensource. I can always have both services running side by side.
I'll setup jellyfin and see which titles I'm unable to add and try to collaborate on metadata. It's always important to favor opensource. I can always have both services running side by side.
You can also manually match each movie from the jellyfin frontend, but the issue with going this path is that if you need to rebuild your jellyfin instance for some reason, you would need to redo all of this manual matching.
So, the recommended path is to clean up the media files:
https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/movies/
https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/shows/
So, the recommended path is to clean up the media files:
https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/movies/
https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/shows/
Soemtimes I have needed to rename files, but to me it is both sensible (how else to recognize a show, maybe a metadata file) and totally worth it.
I don't want to need to have a centralized account to access my media library on my device.
I don't want to have to pay monthly to enable hardware transcoding.
I don't want to need to have a centralized account to access my media library on my device.
I don't want to have to pay monthly to enable hardware transcoding.
I can't because most of my media is in an off-site server and the mount point is readonly
Then rename them at the off-site server?
There are very specific and common standard on renaming video files to contain "metadata" so that every single tool doesn't have to use ffmpeg to investigate and try to guess the exact movie/tv show from the title.
The Plex naming guidelines are pretty good: https://support.plex.tv/articles/naming-and-organizing-your-...
Some people like to add resolution and audio track information to the file name too.
There are very specific and common standard on renaming video files to contain "metadata" so that every single tool doesn't have to use ffmpeg to investigate and try to guess the exact movie/tv show from the title.
The Plex naming guidelines are pretty good: https://support.plex.tv/articles/naming-and-organizing-your-...
Some people like to add resolution and audio track information to the file name too.
I haven't noticed this issue any more than Plex, seems to be more about having all the files in a clear folder for a show/season than the specific individual file names. But YMMV
If you categorize your libraries into their correct directories (i.e. TV into TV, movies into movies), then no.
Their metadata lookup is quite solid.
Their metadata lookup is quite solid.
Will give it a try, thanks
unfortunately things like this happen a lot more than they should
I have been using Jellyfin for two years now.
I am yet another happy user with no issues. I am happy that all my data is secure and there is nothing shady to happen.
It was not surprising when Plex had a huge investment coming from VCs who might as well just be connected to the movie industry and Hollywood as a whole, when they committed the act of banning Hetzner and all of their data centers.
They also had slowly become just another low quality streaming service like Tubi or IMDb with really low quality content being pushed down onto the homepage and actually keeping your own media hidden somewhere in the submenus. With their updates they threw the entire UX upside down.
Plex has the most mature platform to be frank. But I am happy I jumped ship as soon as I saw their predatory practices. They are not going to stop.
It was not surprising when Plex had a huge investment coming from VCs who might as well just be connected to the movie industry and Hollywood as a whole, when they committed the act of banning Hetzner and all of their data centers.
They also had slowly become just another low quality streaming service like Tubi or IMDb with really low quality content being pushed down onto the homepage and actually keeping your own media hidden somewhere in the submenus. With their updates they threw the entire UX upside down.
Plex has the most mature platform to be frank. But I am happy I jumped ship as soon as I saw their predatory practices. They are not going to stop.
I have never had any of their streaming content pushed onto my homepage nor had my own media hidden in submenus. I don't see anything but my own media
You have to be a fool to use Plex, not only you are pirating, but also relying on a 3rd party company to handle your authentication. They already got hacked multiple times, only a matter of time till there is some copyright law enforcement event too.
If you really have to do it, use Emby or Jellyfin. At least those options are fully self hosted.
If you really have to do it, use Emby or Jellyfin. At least those options are fully self hosted.
Plex has their own streaming-with-ads. And one can load it with whatever you want, including home movies or DVD backups.
That said, I shouldn't be blinded by convenience. I hear jellyfin is a good alternative. Can someone share
- how easy is it to administer for clients outside of my network or possibly even outside my country?
- how good is the app support? I transcode all of my media to AAC and h264 for compatibility
-what about for streaming music? I really like Plex amp
- what do you like the most about jellyfin
- what do you miss most about Plex?
Thank you.